Information on the processing of organic food: consumers' perception

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
F. Sinesio, Anna Saba, Elisabetta Moneta, M. Peparaio, Eleonora Saggia Civitelli, Flavio Paoletti
{"title":"Information on the processing of organic food: consumers' perception","authors":"F. Sinesio, Anna Saba, Elisabetta Moneta, M. Peparaio, Eleonora Saggia Civitelli, Flavio Paoletti","doi":"10.1108/bfj-04-2023-0317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study aimed to investigate consumers’ views on criteria to be claimed for organic processed foods and information to be communicated.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was carried out among 439 adults living in Italy, users of processed organic food, to gather opinions on criteria that processing of organic food should meet and on the terms that best define “careful” processing. Next, a conjoint design was applied to examine the effects of five independent factors on consumers' ideal concept of “organic”; these were potential information on packaging, processing, additives and product quality, and the type of food product. Three products with different processing level were selected: an ultra-processed and multi-ingredient product (vegetable burger), a processed product preserved by canning (peas in glass jar) and a minimally processed product (bagged salad).FindingsThe findings highlight that consumers attach more importance to the organic food carrier than the informational messages. Information on the processing and packaging follows, with messages on quality and on additives seemingly of minor importance. Three clusters of respondents were identified: those driven primarily by the type of organic food (24.6%), those placing more emphasis on product processing (21.3%), and a third larger cluster (54.1%) who expressed almost equal importance to all the factors considered. As for the processing of organic products, “eco-friendly” was the best message.Originality/valueThis paper offers insights into what best outlines the ideal concept of “processed organic food” as seen by organic food consumers, to be communicated to better guide their purchasing decisions.","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-04-2023-0317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study aimed to investigate consumers’ views on criteria to be claimed for organic processed foods and information to be communicated.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was carried out among 439 adults living in Italy, users of processed organic food, to gather opinions on criteria that processing of organic food should meet and on the terms that best define “careful” processing. Next, a conjoint design was applied to examine the effects of five independent factors on consumers' ideal concept of “organic”; these were potential information on packaging, processing, additives and product quality, and the type of food product. Three products with different processing level were selected: an ultra-processed and multi-ingredient product (vegetable burger), a processed product preserved by canning (peas in glass jar) and a minimally processed product (bagged salad).FindingsThe findings highlight that consumers attach more importance to the organic food carrier than the informational messages. Information on the processing and packaging follows, with messages on quality and on additives seemingly of minor importance. Three clusters of respondents were identified: those driven primarily by the type of organic food (24.6%), those placing more emphasis on product processing (21.3%), and a third larger cluster (54.1%) who expressed almost equal importance to all the factors considered. As for the processing of organic products, “eco-friendly” was the best message.Originality/valueThis paper offers insights into what best outlines the ideal concept of “processed organic food” as seen by organic food consumers, to be communicated to better guide their purchasing decisions.
有机食品加工信息:消费者的认知
目的本研究旨在调查消费者对有机加工食品要求标准的看法,并传达相关信息。设计/方法/方法对439名生活在意大利的有机加工食品消费者进行了一项在线调查,以收集对有机食品加工应符合的标准和“谨慎”加工的最佳定义的意见。其次,采用联合设计考察了五个独立因素对消费者“有机”理想概念的影响;这些是关于包装、加工、添加剂和产品质量以及食品类型的潜在信息。我们选择了三种不同加工水平的产品:超加工多成分产品(蔬菜汉堡)、罐装加工产品(玻璃罐中的豌豆)和最低加工产品(袋装沙拉)。研究结果强调,消费者更重视有机食品的载体,而不是信息信息。接下来是关于加工和包装的信息,关于质量和添加剂的信息似乎不太重要。确定了三组受访者:主要受有机食品类型驱动的(24.6%),更强调产品加工的(21.3%),第三组(54.1%)对所有考虑的因素表示几乎同等重要。至于有机产品的加工,“环保”是最好的信息。原创性/价值本文提供了对有机食品消费者所看到的“加工有机食品”理想概念的最佳概述的见解,以便更好地指导他们的购买决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信