Shared e-scooter rider safety behaviour and injury outcomes: a review of studies in the United States

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Emma G. P. Sexton , Katherine J. Harmon , Rebecca L. Sanders , Nitesh R. Shah , Meg Bryson , Charles T. Brown , Christopher R. Cherry
{"title":"Shared e-scooter rider safety behaviour and injury outcomes: a review of studies in the United States","authors":"Emma G. P. Sexton ,&nbsp;Katherine J. Harmon ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Sanders ,&nbsp;Nitesh R. Shah ,&nbsp;Meg Bryson ,&nbsp;Charles T. Brown ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Cherry","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2023.2219838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electric scooters (e-scooters) have proliferated throughout North American cities in the past five years, with about 60 million shared e-scooter trips taken in 2021. That growth has resulted in safety and injury prevention challenges, and much of the regulatory approach has been to limit e-scooter use through technological or behavioural interventions. The past few years have yielded a patchwork of regulations based on a diversity of published safety and injury studies, including work on injury burden (e.g. hospitalisation studies), direct observation, rider surveys, or traffic crash (e.g. police-reported crash) analysis. This review draws from disparate studies to develop systematic policy conclusions related primarily to rider safety behaviour and associated injury outcomes, particularly severe injuries. This work focuses on perceived safety, demographics of scooter riders, injury trends of riders, temporal and spatial correlates of shared e-scooter rider injuries and contributing factors like roadway design, impairment, and helmets. While this review focuses on studies that occurred in the United States, some findings transfer elsewhere. The sum of the literature points to the importance of enhanced and maintained infrastructure to improve rider behaviour, predictability, and perceived safety, and increases in driver and e-scooter user education and enforcement to reduce violations and impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"43 6","pages":"Pages 1263-1285"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S014416472300079X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Electric scooters (e-scooters) have proliferated throughout North American cities in the past five years, with about 60 million shared e-scooter trips taken in 2021. That growth has resulted in safety and injury prevention challenges, and much of the regulatory approach has been to limit e-scooter use through technological or behavioural interventions. The past few years have yielded a patchwork of regulations based on a diversity of published safety and injury studies, including work on injury burden (e.g. hospitalisation studies), direct observation, rider surveys, or traffic crash (e.g. police-reported crash) analysis. This review draws from disparate studies to develop systematic policy conclusions related primarily to rider safety behaviour and associated injury outcomes, particularly severe injuries. This work focuses on perceived safety, demographics of scooter riders, injury trends of riders, temporal and spatial correlates of shared e-scooter rider injuries and contributing factors like roadway design, impairment, and helmets. While this review focuses on studies that occurred in the United States, some findings transfer elsewhere. The sum of the literature points to the importance of enhanced and maintained infrastructure to improve rider behaviour, predictability, and perceived safety, and increases in driver and e-scooter user education and enforcement to reduce violations and impairment.

共享电动滑板车骑手的安全行为和伤害结果:美国研究综述
在过去的五年里,电动滑板车(e-scooters)在北美城市遍地开花,到2021年,共有约6000万次共享电动滑板车出行。这种增长带来了安全和伤害预防方面的挑战,许多监管方法都是通过技术或行为干预来限制电动滑板车的使用。过去几年,根据各种已发表的安全和伤害研究,包括伤害负担研究(如住院研究)、直接观察、骑手调查或交通事故(如警察报告的事故)分析,产生了各种各样的法规。本综述从不同的研究中得出系统的政策结论,主要涉及骑手安全行为和相关的伤害结果,特别是严重伤害。这项工作的重点是感知安全性、滑板车乘客的人口统计、乘客的伤害趋势、共享电动滑板车乘客受伤的时空相关性以及道路设计、损伤和头盔等影响因素。虽然这篇综述关注的是发生在美国的研究,但一些发现也适用于其他地方。这些文献的总和指出了加强和维护基础设施对改善骑手行为、可预测性和感知安全性的重要性,以及增加司机和电动滑板车用户教育和执法以减少违规和损害的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信