Threefold Increase in the Number of Drug Resistant TB Cases after Introduction of Universal Drug Susceptibility Testing: Experiences from Two South India Districts
Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, S. Nagaraja, T. Anand, K. Sagili, Cheluve Gowda, Shailaja, Basavaraj Poojar, S. Satyanarayana
{"title":"Threefold Increase in the Number of Drug Resistant TB Cases after Introduction of Universal Drug Susceptibility Testing: Experiences from Two South India Districts","authors":"Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, S. Nagaraja, T. Anand, K. Sagili, Cheluve Gowda, Shailaja, Basavaraj Poojar, S. Satyanarayana","doi":"10.4236/jtr.2020.82005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In India, tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health \nproblem, and the advent of drug resistance TB (DR-TB) has worsened the \nsituation. The Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) has introduced \nuniversal drug susceptibility testing (UDST) for all diagnosed TB cases in \n2018. We conducted this study to know the \nadvantage of implementing UDST when compared to selective testing \nexistent in 2017 on key diagnostic cascade parameters and to identify the \nchallenges in the implementation of UDST. Methods: The study was conducted in two districts of Karnataka, India during \nJanuary 2017-December 2018. The quantitative part consisted of before-and-after \ndesign and the qualitative part consisted of descriptive design. Results: In 2017 (during selective testing/“before” period) out of the 2440 TB patients, 80 (3%) were diagnosed with Isoniazid and \nRifampicin resistance patients; in contrast \nin 2018 (during UDST/“after” period) of the 5129 TB patients 258 (5%) were diagnosed with Isoniazid and Rifampicin resistance. \nHowever, the proportion of eligible patients tested for rifampicin resistance during the “after” period was 60% when compared to \n100% during the “before” period and median turnaround time for testing \nwas also longer during the “after” period when compared to the “before” period \n(32.5 days vs 27.5 days). Major reasons for \nthese two gaps were found to be difficulties in collecting sputum \nspecimens and transportation. Conclusion: The rollout of UDST has led to a three-fold increase in a number of DR-TB cases detected in the \nregion. There is a need for the programme to increase the proportion \ntested for DST by increasing the laboratory capacity and address the challenges \nin sputum collection and transportation.","PeriodicalId":70603,"journal":{"name":"结核病研究(英文)","volume":"08 1","pages":"42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"结核病研究(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2020.82005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: In India, tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health
problem, and the advent of drug resistance TB (DR-TB) has worsened the
situation. The Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) has introduced
universal drug susceptibility testing (UDST) for all diagnosed TB cases in
2018. We conducted this study to know the
advantage of implementing UDST when compared to selective testing
existent in 2017 on key diagnostic cascade parameters and to identify the
challenges in the implementation of UDST. Methods: The study was conducted in two districts of Karnataka, India during
January 2017-December 2018. The quantitative part consisted of before-and-after
design and the qualitative part consisted of descriptive design. Results: In 2017 (during selective testing/“before” period) out of the 2440 TB patients, 80 (3%) were diagnosed with Isoniazid and
Rifampicin resistance patients; in contrast
in 2018 (during UDST/“after” period) of the 5129 TB patients 258 (5%) were diagnosed with Isoniazid and Rifampicin resistance.
However, the proportion of eligible patients tested for rifampicin resistance during the “after” period was 60% when compared to
100% during the “before” period and median turnaround time for testing
was also longer during the “after” period when compared to the “before” period
(32.5 days vs 27.5 days). Major reasons for
these two gaps were found to be difficulties in collecting sputum
specimens and transportation. Conclusion: The rollout of UDST has led to a three-fold increase in a number of DR-TB cases detected in the
region. There is a need for the programme to increase the proportion
tested for DST by increasing the laboratory capacity and address the challenges
in sputum collection and transportation.