{"title":"A History of the Iziko South African National Gallery: Reflections on Art and National Identity, by Anna Tietze","authors":"J. Carman","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2018.1459095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Towards the end of her book, Anna Tietze comments that “a prescriptive stress on nation building” (as required by the 2013 Revised White Paper on Arts, Culture and Heritage) should be balanced by “a concern with what has already been built, in the near or distant past, and especially a concern with those pasts that do not harmonise with current orthodoxy” (p. 202). An accurate, detailed documentation of those pasts is indeed essential for our understanding of the present and future. This is what Tietze sets out to do in her book. Her impeccable archival research, arrangement of the text, and handling of contentious issues make this an important contribution to the history of public institutions in South Africa, and to reflections on art and national identity in general. Tietze constructs the body of her text in accordance with the tenures of different directors (or governance structures) and their impact on the development of the collections and policies. She bookends her five chapters with a lengthy introduction and conclusion in which she discusses issues which are often controversial but need to be voiced. One could quibble with how she discusses classificatory boundaries (fine art versus design, fine art versus craft),1 her overview of western art galleries (or museums),2","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"53 1","pages":"102 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2018.1459095","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2018.1459095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Towards the end of her book, Anna Tietze comments that “a prescriptive stress on nation building” (as required by the 2013 Revised White Paper on Arts, Culture and Heritage) should be balanced by “a concern with what has already been built, in the near or distant past, and especially a concern with those pasts that do not harmonise with current orthodoxy” (p. 202). An accurate, detailed documentation of those pasts is indeed essential for our understanding of the present and future. This is what Tietze sets out to do in her book. Her impeccable archival research, arrangement of the text, and handling of contentious issues make this an important contribution to the history of public institutions in South Africa, and to reflections on art and national identity in general. Tietze constructs the body of her text in accordance with the tenures of different directors (or governance structures) and their impact on the development of the collections and policies. She bookends her five chapters with a lengthy introduction and conclusion in which she discusses issues which are often controversial but need to be voiced. One could quibble with how she discusses classificatory boundaries (fine art versus design, fine art versus craft),1 her overview of western art galleries (or museums),2
Anna Tietze在书的最后评论道,“对国家建设的规定性强调”(正如2013年修订的《艺术、文化和遗产白皮书》所要求的那样)应该与“对近期或远期已经建成的东西的关注,特别是对那些与当前正统观念不一致的过去的关注”相平衡(第202页)。准确、详细地记录这些过去对于我们理解现在和未来确实至关重要。这就是蒂切在她的书中所要做的。她无可挑剔的档案研究、文本安排和对争议问题的处理,使这对南非公共机构的历史,以及对艺术和民族认同的思考做出了重要贡献。蒂切根据不同董事(或治理结构)的任期及其对藏品和政策发展的影响构建了她的文本主体。她在五章的结尾写了一个冗长的引言和结论,讨论了一些经常有争议但需要表达的问题。人们可能会质疑她如何讨论分类界限(美术与设计、美术与工艺),1她对西方美术馆(或博物馆)的概述,2