Analysis of the debate on the concept of the state and citizens in the BPUPK meeting treatise

Syifa Syarifa, M. Japar, Mohammad Maiwan, Intan Suria Hamzah, Dini Nur Fadillah
{"title":"Analysis of the debate on the concept of the state and citizens in the BPUPK meeting treatise","authors":"Syifa Syarifa, M. Japar, Mohammad Maiwan, Intan Suria Hamzah, Dini Nur Fadillah","doi":"10.21831/jc.v19i1.42705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the learning of Pancasila and Civic Education, discussions about BPUPK are often attached to the debates about the formulation of Pancasila as the national principle. In fact, the debates in the BPUPK meeting did not only concern to the national principle, but also about the concept of the state and the citizen. This research aims to analyze how the debate over the concept of the state and citizen is in the treatise of the BPUPK meeting. This research used a qualitative approach with library research methods and qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this research showed that the debate on the concept of the state was divided into two, namely the debate in the form of the state which is faced with the form of a unitary state, union state and  state union, and the debate in the form of government which was faced with the monarchy and republic. Furthermore, the debate about citizens was also divided into two, namely the debate on citizenship for foreign descendants which debates whether or not to make foreign descendants as Indonesian citizens in the Constitution, and the debate on the rights of citizens that debates whether to include or not, the rights of citizens in the Constitution.","PeriodicalId":31732,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.42705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the learning of Pancasila and Civic Education, discussions about BPUPK are often attached to the debates about the formulation of Pancasila as the national principle. In fact, the debates in the BPUPK meeting did not only concern to the national principle, but also about the concept of the state and the citizen. This research aims to analyze how the debate over the concept of the state and citizen is in the treatise of the BPUPK meeting. This research used a qualitative approach with library research methods and qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this research showed that the debate on the concept of the state was divided into two, namely the debate in the form of the state which is faced with the form of a unitary state, union state and  state union, and the debate in the form of government which was faced with the monarchy and republic. Furthermore, the debate about citizens was also divided into two, namely the debate on citizenship for foreign descendants which debates whether or not to make foreign descendants as Indonesian citizens in the Constitution, and the debate on the rights of citizens that debates whether to include or not, the rights of citizens in the Constitution.
分析北京工人党会议论著中关于国家和公民概念的争论
在对Pancasila和公民教育的学习中,关于BPUPK的讨论经常与关于将Pancasilla制定为国家原则的辩论联系在一起。事实上,BPUPK会议上的辩论不仅涉及国家原则,还涉及国家和公民的概念。本研究旨在分析BPUPK会议论文中关于国家和公民概念的争论是如何展开的。本研究采用了定性方法、图书馆研究方法和定性数据分析技术。研究结果表明,关于国家概念的争论分为两部分,即面对单一国家、联邦国家和国家联盟形式的国家形式的争论,以及面对君主制和共和制的政府形式的争论。此外,关于公民的辩论也分为两部分,即关于外国后裔的公民身份的辩论,辩论是否将外国后裔纳入《宪法》,以及关于公民权利的辩论,讨论是否将公民的权利纳入宪法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信