Mutual Analysis: Ferenczi, Severn, and the Origins of Trauma Theory

IF 0.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
P. Hoffer
{"title":"Mutual Analysis: Ferenczi, Severn, and the Origins of Trauma Theory","authors":"P. Hoffer","doi":"10.1080/00332828.2022.2121093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this book, Peter L. Rudnytsky gives us a detailed account of Ferenczi’s controversial analysis of Elizabeth Severn in what may well be seen as a landmark case in the history of psychoanalysis, comparable to that of Anna O., Dora, and the Wolf Man. Written in a lively, engaging style and citing numerous sources—many of which are unpublished and some of which were inaccessible to scholars until recently—Rudnytsky presents an insightful commentary on the time in which Ferenczi’s bold experiments in psychoanalytic technique and modifications in theory put him at loggerheads with Freud, helping to alter the course of history in the process. The book is divided into three sections, titled “Conceptions,” “Contexts,” and “Consequences,” respectively. In “Conceptions,” Rudnytsky explores the lives of Elizabeth Severn and her daughter Margaret, with frequent references to Elizabeth’s book, The Discovery of the Self (published shortly after the termination of her analysis and Ferenczi’s untimely death in May 1933), and to Margaret’s unpublished letters to her mother. In “Contexts,” he examines the interactions within the small cluster of analysands who congregated around Ferenczi in Budapest, most notably Clara Thompson and Izette de Forest, who helped propagate Ferenczi’s ideas in the United States. In “Consequences,” Rudnytsky presents a detailed critique of the dispute over theory and technique which strained the personal relations between Ferenczi and Freud nearly to the breaking point and","PeriodicalId":46869,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Quarterly","volume":"91 1","pages":"632 - 637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.2022.2121093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this book, Peter L. Rudnytsky gives us a detailed account of Ferenczi’s controversial analysis of Elizabeth Severn in what may well be seen as a landmark case in the history of psychoanalysis, comparable to that of Anna O., Dora, and the Wolf Man. Written in a lively, engaging style and citing numerous sources—many of which are unpublished and some of which were inaccessible to scholars until recently—Rudnytsky presents an insightful commentary on the time in which Ferenczi’s bold experiments in psychoanalytic technique and modifications in theory put him at loggerheads with Freud, helping to alter the course of history in the process. The book is divided into three sections, titled “Conceptions,” “Contexts,” and “Consequences,” respectively. In “Conceptions,” Rudnytsky explores the lives of Elizabeth Severn and her daughter Margaret, with frequent references to Elizabeth’s book, The Discovery of the Self (published shortly after the termination of her analysis and Ferenczi’s untimely death in May 1933), and to Margaret’s unpublished letters to her mother. In “Contexts,” he examines the interactions within the small cluster of analysands who congregated around Ferenczi in Budapest, most notably Clara Thompson and Izette de Forest, who helped propagate Ferenczi’s ideas in the United States. In “Consequences,” Rudnytsky presents a detailed critique of the dispute over theory and technique which strained the personal relations between Ferenczi and Freud nearly to the breaking point and
相互分析:Ferenczi, Severn和创伤理论的起源
在这本书中,Peter L.Rudnytsky向我们详细介绍了费伦齐对伊丽莎白·塞文的争议性分析,这很可能被视为精神分析史上的一个里程碑式的案例,可以与安娜·O、多拉和狼人的案例相媲美,鲁德尼茨基以引人入胜的风格引用了大量的资料——其中许多资料尚未发表,有些资料直到最近才为学者所知——他对费伦齐在精神分析技术和理论修改方面的大胆实验使他与弗洛伊德发生争执的时期发表了富有洞察力的评论,帮助改变了这一过程中的历史进程。这本书分为三个部分,分别题为“概念”、“背景”和“后果”。在《概念》一书中,鲁德尼茨基探讨了伊丽莎白·塞文和她的女儿玛格丽特的生活,经常提到伊丽莎白的书《自我的发现》(在她的分析和费伦茨于1933年5月英年早逝后不久出版),以及玛格丽特未出版的给母亲的信。在《语境》中,他考察了聚集在布达佩斯费伦茨周围的一小群分析人士之间的互动,最著名的是克拉拉·汤普森和伊泽特·德·福雷斯特,他们帮助在美国传播了费伦茨的思想。在《后果》一书中,鲁德尼茨基对费伦齐和弗洛伊德之间的个人关系紧张到几乎崩溃的理论和技巧之争进行了详细的批判
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Quarterly
Psychoanalytic Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信