Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods to identification of soil moisture monitoring sites in an urban catchment in South Australia

IF 3.7 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Dinesh Chammika Ratnayake, Guna A. Hewa, David J. Kemp, Alaa A. Ahmed
{"title":"Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods to identification of soil moisture monitoring sites in an urban catchment in South Australia","authors":"Dinesh Chammika Ratnayake,&nbsp;Guna A. Hewa,&nbsp;David J. Kemp,&nbsp;Alaa A. Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2022.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When choosing sites for monitoring of soil moisture for hydrological purposes, a suitable process that considers the factors influencing soil moisture level should be followed. In this study, two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, the multi-influencing factor (MIF) method and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, were used to identify the optimal soil moisture monitoring (SMM) sites in the Dry Creek Catchment in South Australia. The most representative areas for nine SMM sites were obtained using the MIF method, considering the factors of rainfall, soil type, land use, catchment slope, elevation, and upslope accumulated area (UAA). The AHP method was used to select the optimal sites using the site-specific criteria. 30.3% of the catchment area in the Australian Water Resources Assessment Landscape (AWRA-L) Grid_DC2 can be considered acceptable as representative area with the MIF method. Four potential sites were evaluated for each AWRA-L grid using the relative weights of the site-specific criteria with the AHP method. The Grid_DC2 required two sites that had the highest overall weight chosen with the AHP analysis. The procedure was repeated for the remaining four AWRA-L grids within the study area to select the required SMM sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 294-304"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237022000680/pdfft?md5=f2c45ee87c971f1ea9fdb862c193f1d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1674237022000680-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237022000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When choosing sites for monitoring of soil moisture for hydrological purposes, a suitable process that considers the factors influencing soil moisture level should be followed. In this study, two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, the multi-influencing factor (MIF) method and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, were used to identify the optimal soil moisture monitoring (SMM) sites in the Dry Creek Catchment in South Australia. The most representative areas for nine SMM sites were obtained using the MIF method, considering the factors of rainfall, soil type, land use, catchment slope, elevation, and upslope accumulated area (UAA). The AHP method was used to select the optimal sites using the site-specific criteria. 30.3% of the catchment area in the Australian Water Resources Assessment Landscape (AWRA-L) Grid_DC2 can be considered acceptable as representative area with the MIF method. Four potential sites were evaluated for each AWRA-L grid using the relative weights of the site-specific criteria with the AHP method. The Grid_DC2 required two sites that had the highest overall weight chosen with the AHP analysis. The procedure was repeated for the remaining four AWRA-L grids within the study area to select the required SMM sites.

多准则决策方法在南澳大利亚城市集水区土壤湿度监测点识别中的应用
在为水文目的选择土壤湿度监测点时,应遵循考虑影响土壤湿度水平因素的适当程序。本研究采用多影响因子法(MIF)和层次分析法(AHP)两种多准则决策(MCDM)方法,确定了南澳大利亚干溪流域土壤湿度监测(SMM)的最佳场址。考虑降雨、土壤类型、土地利用、流域坡度、高程和上坡累积面积等因素,采用MIF方法获得了9个SMM站点最具代表性的区域。采用AHP法,根据选址标准选择最优选址。在澳大利亚水资源评估景观(AWRA-L)网格dc2中,30.3%的集水区可以被认为是MIF方法可以接受的代表性区域。采用AHP法对每个AWRA-L网格的4个潜在站点进行评价,采用站点特定标准的相对权重。Grid_DC2需要AHP分析选择的两个总权重最高的站点。在研究区内的其余四个AWRA-L网格重复此程序,以选择所需的SMM站点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信