{"title":"On efficient change point detection using a step cumulative sum control chart","authors":"Nasir Abbas","doi":"10.1080/08982112.2023.2193896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Control charts are widely used to monitor the stability of processes and Shewhart is the most commonly used type of chart because of the simplicity of its structure. To improve the performance, there are several modifications on control chart suggested since its proposal like cumulative sum and exponentially weighted moving average control charts. The cumulative sum chart accumulates all the deviations from target mean higher than a specific design parameter which can be used to controls the sensitivity of this chart. The optimal choice of this design parameter is half of the target shift size. This results into an optimal performance in terms of quick detection of shift that is equal to the target shift size. For shift sizes other than target, the cumulative sum chart loses its performance and becomes inferior to other control charts in terms of average run length. Since we rarely know the process shift size that is going to occur in future, this study proposes a revision in the structure of cumulative sum chart. The adjusted cumulative sum chart is shown to be very flexible for a wide range of shifts, when designed against a target shift size. The proposed adjusted cumulative sum control chart is compared with cumulative sum, exponentially weighted, combined Shewhart-CUSUM, progressive mean, double progressive mean and mixed EWMA-CUSUM control charts in terms of zero- and steady-state average run lengths. The superiority zones are identified and the results are supported by a real-life implementation of the proposed scheme.","PeriodicalId":20846,"journal":{"name":"Quality Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"712 - 728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2023.2193896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract Control charts are widely used to monitor the stability of processes and Shewhart is the most commonly used type of chart because of the simplicity of its structure. To improve the performance, there are several modifications on control chart suggested since its proposal like cumulative sum and exponentially weighted moving average control charts. The cumulative sum chart accumulates all the deviations from target mean higher than a specific design parameter which can be used to controls the sensitivity of this chart. The optimal choice of this design parameter is half of the target shift size. This results into an optimal performance in terms of quick detection of shift that is equal to the target shift size. For shift sizes other than target, the cumulative sum chart loses its performance and becomes inferior to other control charts in terms of average run length. Since we rarely know the process shift size that is going to occur in future, this study proposes a revision in the structure of cumulative sum chart. The adjusted cumulative sum chart is shown to be very flexible for a wide range of shifts, when designed against a target shift size. The proposed adjusted cumulative sum control chart is compared with cumulative sum, exponentially weighted, combined Shewhart-CUSUM, progressive mean, double progressive mean and mixed EWMA-CUSUM control charts in terms of zero- and steady-state average run lengths. The superiority zones are identified and the results are supported by a real-life implementation of the proposed scheme.
期刊介绍:
Quality Engineering aims to promote a rich exchange among the quality engineering community by publishing papers that describe new engineering methods ready for immediate industrial application or examples of techniques uniquely employed.
You are invited to submit manuscripts and application experiences that explore:
Experimental engineering design and analysis
Measurement system analysis in engineering
Engineering process modelling
Product and process optimization in engineering
Quality control and process monitoring in engineering
Engineering regression
Reliability in engineering
Response surface methodology in engineering
Robust engineering parameter design
Six Sigma method enhancement in engineering
Statistical engineering
Engineering test and evaluation techniques.