The Criticism of Utsman Najati to Modern Psychology

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Kholid Muslih, Husna Hisaba Kholid, Amir Reza Kusuma, Fachri Khoerudin
{"title":"The Criticism of Utsman Najati to Modern Psychology","authors":"Muhammad Kholid Muslih, Husna Hisaba Kholid, Amir Reza Kusuma, Fachri Khoerudin","doi":"10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychology has provided a significant effect in describing human behavior in the modern era. However, despite the extensive development of theories in modern psychology, this field of science still needs to improve in terms of terminology, epistemology, and worldview. One of the Muslim psychologists who criticized this problem was Utsman Najati. This research was library research, and the data sources consisted of primary data sources from Utsman Najati's works related to Psychology, and secondary data sources, namely in the form of books, which were relevant to this research to strengthen arguments and to complement data from research results. The data analysis technique used by the authors in this study was content analysis. The findings obtained from this paper were as follows: First, Utsman Najati revealed the disparity between the terms of psychology and research objects which were limited to behavior; Second, Utsman Najati uncovered the problem of the epistemology of psychology, which limited itself to empirical things; Third, a materialistic and atheist perspective in several schools of modern psychology contradicted the Islamic view of life.","PeriodicalId":42058,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychology has provided a significant effect in describing human behavior in the modern era. However, despite the extensive development of theories in modern psychology, this field of science still needs to improve in terms of terminology, epistemology, and worldview. One of the Muslim psychologists who criticized this problem was Utsman Najati. This research was library research, and the data sources consisted of primary data sources from Utsman Najati's works related to Psychology, and secondary data sources, namely in the form of books, which were relevant to this research to strengthen arguments and to complement data from research results. The data analysis technique used by the authors in this study was content analysis. The findings obtained from this paper were as follows: First, Utsman Najati revealed the disparity between the terms of psychology and research objects which were limited to behavior; Second, Utsman Najati uncovered the problem of the epistemology of psychology, which limited itself to empirical things; Third, a materialistic and atheist perspective in several schools of modern psychology contradicted the Islamic view of life.
乌茨曼·纳贾提对现代心理学的批判
心理学在描述现代人类行为方面发挥了重要作用。然而,尽管现代心理学的理论得到了广泛的发展,但这一科学领域在术语、认识论和世界观方面仍然需要改进。批评这个问题的穆斯林心理学家之一是Utsman Najati。本研究为图书馆研究,数据来源包括Utsman Najati的心理学相关著作中的一手数据来源和与本研究相关的书籍形式的二手数据来源,以加强论点和补充研究结果的数据。作者在本研究中使用的数据分析技术是内容分析。本文的研究发现如下:首先,Utsman Najati揭示了心理学术语与研究对象之间的差异,这些术语仅限于行为;其次,Utsman Najati揭示了心理学的认识论问题,它将自己局限于经验的事物;第三,一些现代心理学学派的唯物主义和无神论观点与伊斯兰教的人生观相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogia
Dialogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信