An Empirical Assessment of the European Commission’s Cartel Prosecutions, 2010–2019

Q2 Social Sciences
C. Veljanovski
{"title":"An Empirical Assessment of the European Commission’s Cartel Prosecutions, 2010–2019","authors":"C. Veljanovski","doi":"10.1177/0003603x231180252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a quantitative analysis of the European Commission’s cartel decisions in the 2010–2019 decade. It assesses the way the Commission’s 2006 guidelines on fines were applied in practice and the operation of the leniency and settlement procedures. It also provides an overview of the types of cartels prosecuted, how they were detected, and how long the Commission took to investigate a cartel. It looks at rends in the Commission’s enforcement activity and assesses some frequently made claims such as whether recidivism is rife; whether the Commission’s leniency program is excessively generous and disproportionately benefits larger, more culpable firms; how much the settlements procedure reduces the length of the Commission’s investigations; and why the Commission takes so long to conclude its investigations.","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"68 1","pages":"411 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x231180252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a quantitative analysis of the European Commission’s cartel decisions in the 2010–2019 decade. It assesses the way the Commission’s 2006 guidelines on fines were applied in practice and the operation of the leniency and settlement procedures. It also provides an overview of the types of cartels prosecuted, how they were detected, and how long the Commission took to investigate a cartel. It looks at rends in the Commission’s enforcement activity and assesses some frequently made claims such as whether recidivism is rife; whether the Commission’s leniency program is excessively generous and disproportionately benefits larger, more culpable firms; how much the settlements procedure reduces the length of the Commission’s investigations; and why the Commission takes so long to conclude its investigations.
2010-2019年欧盟委员会卡特尔起诉的实证评估
这是对欧盟委员会2010-2019年十年卡特尔决策的定量分析。报告评估了欧盟委员会2006年关于罚款的指导方针在实践中的应用方式,以及宽大处理和和解程序的运作情况。它还概述了被起诉的卡特尔的类型,它们是如何被发现的,以及委员会调查一个卡特尔花了多长时间。它着眼于委员会执法活动的趋势,并评估一些经常提出的主张,如累犯是否普遍;委员会的宽大处理计划是否过于慷慨,不成比例地惠及更大、罪责更重的公司;和解程序在多大程度上缩短了委员会调查的时间;以及为什么委员会花了这么长时间才完成调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信