Temporal development of student burnout symptoms: Sociodemographic differences and linkage to university dropout intentions

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Derya Turhan , Anne Scheunemann , Theresa Schnettler , Lisa Bäulke , Daniel O. Thies , Markus Dresel , Stefan Fries , Detlev Leutner , Joachim Wirth , Carola Grunschel
{"title":"Temporal development of student burnout symptoms: Sociodemographic differences and linkage to university dropout intentions","authors":"Derya Turhan ,&nbsp;Anne Scheunemann ,&nbsp;Theresa Schnettler ,&nbsp;Lisa Bäulke ,&nbsp;Daniel O. Thies ,&nbsp;Markus Dresel ,&nbsp;Stefan Fries ,&nbsp;Detlev Leutner ,&nbsp;Joachim Wirth ,&nbsp;Carola Grunschel","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Considering the demanding higher education context, university students are at risk to experience burnout symptoms such as emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy. Theoretical models (e.g., Job Demands-Resources Model) state that burnout symptoms develop over time, vary between individuals, and bear adverse consequences. To date, the temporal development of student burnout symptoms <em>within</em> semesters, inter-individual differences in their development, and the role of their development for academic outcomes like student dropout are understudied. To complement this limited research, we used date of a three-wave longitudinal study with <em>N</em> = 1435 undergraduate students over one semester. First, we modeled <em>unconditional</em> second-order latent growth curves to examine the initial levels and trajectories of each burnout symptom (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy). We then modeled <em>conditional</em> second-order latent growth curves to examine whether initial levels and trajectories differed depending on students’ sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, study progress, and academic major) and associated with students’ intentions to drop out from university. Results indicated a linear increase in student burnout symptoms over the semester. Sociodemographic differences existed in the initial levels of emotional exhaustion and reduced professional efficacy and the trajectories of each symptom. Generally, female, STEM, and higher- and lower- semester students were particularly affected by burnout symptoms. Further, higher initial levels and an increase in each symptom corresponded with higher dropout intentions. Summarizing, the results highlighted that student burnout symptoms increase as the semester progresses, seem more pronounced among certain student groups, and operate as strong predictors for dropout intentions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the demanding higher education context, university students are at risk to experience burnout symptoms such as emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy. Theoretical models (e.g., Job Demands-Resources Model) state that burnout symptoms develop over time, vary between individuals, and bear adverse consequences. To date, the temporal development of student burnout symptoms within semesters, inter-individual differences in their development, and the role of their development for academic outcomes like student dropout are understudied. To complement this limited research, we used date of a three-wave longitudinal study with N = 1435 undergraduate students over one semester. First, we modeled unconditional second-order latent growth curves to examine the initial levels and trajectories of each burnout symptom (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy). We then modeled conditional second-order latent growth curves to examine whether initial levels and trajectories differed depending on students’ sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, study progress, and academic major) and associated with students’ intentions to drop out from university. Results indicated a linear increase in student burnout symptoms over the semester. Sociodemographic differences existed in the initial levels of emotional exhaustion and reduced professional efficacy and the trajectories of each symptom. Generally, female, STEM, and higher- and lower- semester students were particularly affected by burnout symptoms. Further, higher initial levels and an increase in each symptom corresponded with higher dropout intentions. Summarizing, the results highlighted that student burnout symptoms increase as the semester progresses, seem more pronounced among certain student groups, and operate as strong predictors for dropout intentions.

学生倦怠症状的时间发展:社会人口学差异及其与大学退学意向的联系
考虑到高等教育的苛刻环境,大学生有可能出现情绪衰竭、玩世不恭和职业效能降低等倦怠症状。理论模型(例如,工作需求-资源模型)表明,倦怠症状随着时间的推移而发展,因人而异,并会产生不良后果。迄今为止,学生倦怠症状在学期内的时间发展、其发展的个体间差异以及其发展对学生退学等学业成果的作用的研究尚不充分。为了补充这一有限的研究,我们使用了一项三波纵向研究的数据,其中N = 1435名本科生超过一个学期。首先,我们建立了无条件二阶潜在增长曲线模型,以检验每个倦怠症状(情绪耗竭、玩世不恭和职业效能降低)的初始水平和轨迹。然后,我们建立了条件二阶潜在增长曲线模型,以检验初始水平和轨迹是否因学生的社会人口学特征(性别、年龄、学习进度和学术专业)而异,并与学生的退学意向有关。结果表明,学生倦怠症状在整个学期呈线性增加。在情绪耗竭和职业效能降低的初始水平和每种症状的轨迹上存在社会人口统计学差异。总体而言,女性、STEM、高年级和低年级学生受倦怠症状的影响尤甚。此外,较高的初始水平和每种症状的增加与较高的辍学意图相对应。总之,结果强调,学生倦怠症状随着学期的进展而增加,在某些学生群体中似乎更为明显,并且作为退学意图的有力预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信