{"title":"Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate (IDC-P), Grade Group, and Molecular Pathology: Recent Advances and Practical Implication","authors":"Ashwyna Sunassee, G. A. Sannaa, J. Ro","doi":"10.32948/AUO.2019.03.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma is widely used internationally and is based on microscopic architectural patterns of tumors. Over the years, there have been modifications to the original grading system established by Donald F Gleason in 1966 and refined in 1974 which have subsequently been established by the World Health Organization in its WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs book, published in 2016. There have been certain practical issues associated with the changes, of note, the addition of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P), which unlike its breast counterpart rarely occurs in isolation without association with invasive carcinoma and tends to be associated with high-grade invasive carcinoma. In addition, the Grade group system has been introduced which categorizes tumors into prognostically relevant groups based on the histological grade scores. The grade group system brings to light the importance of making accurate scoring and subsequent grouping of the tumors as it affects the clinical treatment, prognostic implication and stage assignment. Molecular pathology of the prostate is not widely utilized in clinical practice, but is emerging. The most common genomic aberration in prostate cancer includes gene fusion, amplification, deletion, and mutation. In addition, up and down regulation of gene expression in critical cellular pathways is also at play. A series of long noncoding RNA expression changes have been also unveiled from transcriptome sequencing data. They play a regulatory role in prostate cancer and are promising diagnostic and potentially prognostic markers as well as molecular treatment strategy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in molecular pathology of prostate cancer and their emerging clinical utility with currently available molecular tests. In this review article, we discuss the followings: 1) Gleason grading system with its modification, 2) Grade group, 3) Intraductal carcinoma, and 4) molecular pathology. Additionally, we present that molecular studies continue to emerge, and there is significant opportunity for targeted therapeutic options that remains to be explored in depth.","PeriodicalId":33190,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Urologic Oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Urologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32948/AUO.2019.03.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma is widely used internationally and is based on microscopic architectural patterns of tumors. Over the years, there have been modifications to the original grading system established by Donald F Gleason in 1966 and refined in 1974 which have subsequently been established by the World Health Organization in its WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs book, published in 2016. There have been certain practical issues associated with the changes, of note, the addition of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P), which unlike its breast counterpart rarely occurs in isolation without association with invasive carcinoma and tends to be associated with high-grade invasive carcinoma. In addition, the Grade group system has been introduced which categorizes tumors into prognostically relevant groups based on the histological grade scores. The grade group system brings to light the importance of making accurate scoring and subsequent grouping of the tumors as it affects the clinical treatment, prognostic implication and stage assignment. Molecular pathology of the prostate is not widely utilized in clinical practice, but is emerging. The most common genomic aberration in prostate cancer includes gene fusion, amplification, deletion, and mutation. In addition, up and down regulation of gene expression in critical cellular pathways is also at play. A series of long noncoding RNA expression changes have been also unveiled from transcriptome sequencing data. They play a regulatory role in prostate cancer and are promising diagnostic and potentially prognostic markers as well as molecular treatment strategy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in molecular pathology of prostate cancer and their emerging clinical utility with currently available molecular tests. In this review article, we discuss the followings: 1) Gleason grading system with its modification, 2) Grade group, 3) Intraductal carcinoma, and 4) molecular pathology. Additionally, we present that molecular studies continue to emerge, and there is significant opportunity for targeted therapeutic options that remains to be explored in depth.
国际上广泛使用的前列腺癌Gleason分级系统是基于肿瘤的显微结构模式。多年来,对Donald F Gleason于1966年建立并于1974年完善的原始分级系统进行了修改,随后由世界卫生组织在2016年出版的《WHO泌尿系统和男性生殖器官肿瘤分类》一书中建立。与这些变化相关的一些实际问题,值得注意的是,前列腺导管内癌(IDC-P)的增加,与乳腺导管内癌不同,它很少单独发生,与浸润性癌无关,往往与高级别浸润性癌有关。此外,还引入了分级分组系统,根据组织学分级评分将肿瘤分为与预后相关的组。分级分组系统揭示了对肿瘤进行准确评分和后续分组的重要性,因为它影响临床治疗、预后意义和分期分配。前列腺分子病理学尚未广泛应用于临床实践,但正在兴起。前列腺癌中最常见的基因组畸变包括基因融合、扩增、缺失和突变。此外,关键细胞通路中基因表达的上下调节也在起作用。转录组测序数据也揭示了一系列长链非编码RNA的表达变化。它们在前列腺癌中起调节作用,是有希望的诊断和潜在的预后标记以及分子治疗策略。在这篇综述中,我们总结了前列腺癌分子病理学的最新进展及其在目前可用的分子检测中的临床应用。本文就以下内容作一综述:1)Gleason分级系统及其改进;2)分级组;3)导管内癌;4)分子病理学。此外,我们认为分子研究不断涌现,有针对性的治疗选择的重大机会仍有待深入探索。