T. S. ELIOT AND EMILE DURKHEIM: SACRED AND PROFANE IN "THE LOVE SONG OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK"

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Muhammad Hussein Oroskhan, Hossein Jahantigh
{"title":"T. S. ELIOT AND EMILE DURKHEIM: SACRED AND PROFANE IN \"THE LOVE SONG OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK\"","authors":"Muhammad Hussein Oroskhan, Hossein Jahantigh","doi":"10.31902/fll.39.2022.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along history, sociology and literature have formed various associations with each other. From the sociology of literature that has considered literature as a social production to the usages of sociological perspectives as literary theories or the usage of literature as illustration of sociological abstract notions, literature and sociology have been constantly and interrelatedly studied. Nevertheless, this study aims at revealing another interrelation between literature and sociology by referring to the beginning of the twentieth century when the replacement of religious thinking with secular ideas was dominant in modern society. Sociologists like Emile Durkheim detected and studied this shift in modern society and later on literary authors of the time followed the promotion of secularism in their literary works. However, T.S. Eliot reacted to this replacement in his poem \"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock\". He wrote the poem while he was reviewing Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life in the journal the Westminster Gazette. This paper argues that T.S. Eliot’s \"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock\" is written with a mindset loaded by Durkheim’s sociological perspectives such as the notions of the sacred and the profane to further conclude that T. S. Eliot’s creation of Prufrock is consistent with the view that the modern man is unable to establish himself in a society which is devoid of the notions of sacred and profane and that he may consider committing suicide to save himself as the final resort.","PeriodicalId":40358,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.39.2022.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Along history, sociology and literature have formed various associations with each other. From the sociology of literature that has considered literature as a social production to the usages of sociological perspectives as literary theories or the usage of literature as illustration of sociological abstract notions, literature and sociology have been constantly and interrelatedly studied. Nevertheless, this study aims at revealing another interrelation between literature and sociology by referring to the beginning of the twentieth century when the replacement of religious thinking with secular ideas was dominant in modern society. Sociologists like Emile Durkheim detected and studied this shift in modern society and later on literary authors of the time followed the promotion of secularism in their literary works. However, T.S. Eliot reacted to this replacement in his poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock". He wrote the poem while he was reviewing Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life in the journal the Westminster Gazette. This paper argues that T.S. Eliot’s "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" is written with a mindset loaded by Durkheim’s sociological perspectives such as the notions of the sacred and the profane to further conclude that T. S. Eliot’s creation of Prufrock is consistent with the view that the modern man is unable to establish himself in a society which is devoid of the notions of sacred and profane and that he may consider committing suicide to save himself as the final resort.
艾略特与涂尔干:《普鲁弗洛克情歌》中的神圣与亵渎
在历史的长河中,社会学与文学形成了各种各样的联系。从将文学视为社会生产的文学社会学,到将社会学视角用作文学理论,或将文学用作社会学抽象概念的例证,文学和社会学一直在进行相互关联的研究。然而,本研究旨在通过参考20世纪初,揭示文学与社会学之间的另一种相互关系,当时以世俗思想取代宗教思想在现代社会中占主导地位。像埃米尔·涂尔干这样的社会学家发现并研究了现代社会的这种转变,后来那个时代的文学作家在他们的文学作品中提倡世俗主义。然而,T.S.艾略特在他的诗《J·阿尔弗雷德·普鲁弗洛克的情歌》中对这一替换做出了反应。这首诗是他在《威斯敏斯特公报》上评论涂尔干的《宗教生活的基本形式》时写的。本文认为,T·S·艾略特的《普鲁弗洛克的情歌》是以涂尔干的社会学视角,如神圣和世俗的观念为负载的心态写成的。艾略特对普鲁弗洛克的创作符合这样一种观点,即现代人无法在一个没有神圣和世俗观念的社会中站稳脚跟,他可能会考虑自杀来拯救自己作为最后的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信