Recent Studies of Ethnic Differences in the Cognitive Ability of Adolescents in the United Kingdom

Q3 Arts and Humanities
R. Lynn, J. Fuerst
{"title":"Recent Studies of Ethnic Differences in the Cognitive Ability of Adolescents in the United Kingdom","authors":"R. Lynn, J. Fuerst","doi":"10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research from the 20th century showed that ethnic minorities under-performed White British on measures of cognitive ability in the United Kingdom. However, academic qualification results from the first two decades of the 21st century suggest minimal to reverse ethnic differences. To better understand the pattern of contemporary cognitive differences among adolescents in the 21st century, we analyzed academic achievements at age 16 in the GCSE and cognitive ability in four cognitive tests: the National Reference Test, NRT; the Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA; Cognitive Ability Test 3 (CAT3); and Center for Evaluation and Monitoring (CEM) 11-plus. Results from the PISA, CAT3 and CEM 11-plus tests correlate strongly across ethnic groups. These results show that Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Black students score approximately one half of a standard deviation below Indian and White students, while Chinese students perform significantly above the latter groups. In contrast, but consistent with academic qualifications, results based on the NRT suggest smaller ethnic gaps.","PeriodicalId":35516,"journal":{"name":"Mankind Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"987-999"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2021.61.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research from the 20th century showed that ethnic minorities under-performed White British on measures of cognitive ability in the United Kingdom. However, academic qualification results from the first two decades of the 21st century suggest minimal to reverse ethnic differences. To better understand the pattern of contemporary cognitive differences among adolescents in the 21st century, we analyzed academic achievements at age 16 in the GCSE and cognitive ability in four cognitive tests: the National Reference Test, NRT; the Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA; Cognitive Ability Test 3 (CAT3); and Center for Evaluation and Monitoring (CEM) 11-plus. Results from the PISA, CAT3 and CEM 11-plus tests correlate strongly across ethnic groups. These results show that Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Black students score approximately one half of a standard deviation below Indian and White students, while Chinese students perform significantly above the latter groups. In contrast, but consistent with academic qualifications, results based on the NRT suggest smaller ethnic gaps.
英国青少年认知能力的种族差异研究进展
20世纪的研究表明,在英国,少数民族在认知能力方面的表现低于英国白人。然而,21世纪前20年的学术资格结果表明,扭转种族差异的可能性微乎其微。为了更好地了解21世纪青少年当代认知差异的模式,我们分析了16岁时普通中等教育证书的学业成绩和四项认知测试的认知能力:国家参考测试;国际学生评估方案;认知能力测试3(CAT3);以及评估和监测中心(CEM)11plus。PISA、CAT3和CEM 11 plus测试的结果在不同种族之间具有强烈的相关性。这些结果表明,孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和黑人学生的得分比印度和白人学生低约一半的标准差,而中国学生的表现明显高于后者。相比之下,但与学历一致,基于NRT的结果表明种族差距较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mankind Quarterly
Mankind Quarterly Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Mankind Quarterly was founded as a quarterly journal of anthropology, in the broadest sense of "the science of man," in 1961. This was a time when the "study of man" had already diversified into physical anthropology, ethnography, quantitative cross-cultural research, archaeology and other subspecialties. Psychological and linguistic approaches were explored but the genetic study of population structure and population history was still in its infancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信