The Development Strategy of Soybean Agribusiness in PT Lentera Panen Mandiri

Agro Ekonomi Pub Date : 2018-07-25 DOI:10.22146/AE.30506
Dewi Nurpitasari, L. R. Waluyati, J. Mulyo
{"title":"The Development Strategy of Soybean Agribusiness in PT Lentera Panen Mandiri","authors":"Dewi Nurpitasari, L. R. Waluyati, J. Mulyo","doi":"10.22146/AE.30506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study are to identify both internal and external factors of agribusiness in PT Lentera Panen Mandiri (PT LPM), map the company’s position, and determine its development strategy. Main data used in this study is primary data obtained from stakeholders of PT LPM by direct interview. Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) of soybean agribusiness in PT LPM were identified in this study and followed by determining the company’s position using SWOT diagram. Alternative srategies were derived from the SWOT matrix and prioritized using Quantitative Strategies Planning Matrix (QSPM) analysis. The results of this study identified 5 strengths, 7 weaknesses, 9 opportunities, and 6 threaths with the highest factors consisted as \"company's commitment to supervise and foster farmers and suppliers\", \"is time-consuming sorting process and potency of mixed between rice and soybean\", \"opportunity to increase the  productivity of soybean at farmer level \", and \"uncommit suppliers to supply only from areas that have been approved by the company\" respectively. Based on the  SWOT diagram, soybean agribussiness in PT LPM positioned in Quadrant I, which mean that the company should apply Agressive Strategy or Strength – Opportunity (S-O) strategy. Based on the SWOT Matrix, 5 alternative of S-O strategies were derived. Based on the QSPM analysis, strategy for guarding and coaching farmers through patnership scheme is the first priority with Total Attarctive Score (TAS) is 12.9.","PeriodicalId":33120,"journal":{"name":"Agro Ekonomi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro Ekonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/AE.30506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aims of this study are to identify both internal and external factors of agribusiness in PT Lentera Panen Mandiri (PT LPM), map the company’s position, and determine its development strategy. Main data used in this study is primary data obtained from stakeholders of PT LPM by direct interview. Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) of soybean agribusiness in PT LPM were identified in this study and followed by determining the company’s position using SWOT diagram. Alternative srategies were derived from the SWOT matrix and prioritized using Quantitative Strategies Planning Matrix (QSPM) analysis. The results of this study identified 5 strengths, 7 weaknesses, 9 opportunities, and 6 threaths with the highest factors consisted as "company's commitment to supervise and foster farmers and suppliers", "is time-consuming sorting process and potency of mixed between rice and soybean", "opportunity to increase the  productivity of soybean at farmer level ", and "uncommit suppliers to supply only from areas that have been approved by the company" respectively. Based on the  SWOT diagram, soybean agribussiness in PT LPM positioned in Quadrant I, which mean that the company should apply Agressive Strategy or Strength – Opportunity (S-O) strategy. Based on the SWOT Matrix, 5 alternative of S-O strategies were derived. Based on the QSPM analysis, strategy for guarding and coaching farmers through patnership scheme is the first priority with Total Attarctive Score (TAS) is 12.9.
帕南曼迪里省大豆农业综合企业的发展战略
本研究的目的是确定PT Lentera Panen Mandiri(PT LPM)农业综合企业的内部和外部因素,绘制公司的位置图,并确定其发展战略。本研究使用的主要数据是通过直接访谈从PT LPM的利益相关者那里获得的主要数据。本研究确定了PT LPM大豆农业企业的优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT),并利用SWOT图确定了该公司的地位。备选战略是从SWOT矩阵中得出的,并使用定量战略规划矩阵(QSPM)分析进行优先排序。本研究的结果确定了5个优势、7个劣势、9个机会和6个威胁,其中最高的因素包括“公司对监督和培养农民和供应商的承诺”、“大米和大豆混合的分拣过程和效力耗时”、“在农民层面提高大豆生产力的机会”、,和“取消供应商只能从公司批准的地区供货的限制”。根据SWOT图,PT LPM中的大豆农业企业位于象限I,这意味着该公司应该采用进取战略或优势-机会(S-O)战略。基于SWOT矩阵,推导出5种S-O战略选择。根据QSPM分析,通过伙伴关系计划保护和指导农民的策略是第一要务,总成绩(TAS)为12.9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信