A comparison of ultrasonic temperature monitoring using machine learning and physics-based methods for high-cycle thermal fatigue monitoring

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laurence Clarkson, Yifeng Zhang, F. Cegla
{"title":"A comparison of ultrasonic temperature monitoring using machine learning and physics-based methods for high-cycle thermal fatigue monitoring","authors":"Laurence Clarkson, Yifeng Zhang, F. Cegla","doi":"10.1177/14759217231190041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure of pipe network components in so-called mixing zones due to high-cycle thermal fatigue (HCTF) can occur within nuclear power plants where fluids of different thermal and hydraulic properties interact. Given that the consequences of such failures are potentially deadly, a method to monitor HCTF non-invasively in real-time is expected to be of great use. This method may be realised by a technique to determine the inaccessible temperature distribution of a component since thermal gradients drive HCTF. Previous work showed that a physics-based method called the inverse thermal modelling (ITM) method can obtain the temperature distribution from external temperature and ultrasonic time of flight (TOF) measurements. This study investigated whether the long-short-term memory (LSTM) machine learning architecture could be a faster alternative to the ITM method for data inversion. On experimental data, a 25-member ensemble of LSTM networks achieved an ensemble median root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.04°C and an ensemble median mean error of 0.194°C (both relative to a resistance temperature device measurement). These values are similar to the ITM method which achieved a RMSE of 1.04°C and a mean error of 0.196°C. The single LSTM network and the ITM method achieved a computation-to-real-world time ratio of 0.008% and 14%, respectively demonstrating that both methods can invert data in real-time. Simulation studies revealed that LSTM performance is sensitive to small differences between the training and real-world parameters leading to unacceptable errors. However, these errors can be detected via an ensemble of independent networks and, corrected by simply adding a correction factor to the TOF prior to being input into the networks. The results show that LSTM has the potential to be an alternative to the ITM method; however, the authors favour ITM for temperature distribution monitoring given its interpretability.","PeriodicalId":51184,"journal":{"name":"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231190041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure of pipe network components in so-called mixing zones due to high-cycle thermal fatigue (HCTF) can occur within nuclear power plants where fluids of different thermal and hydraulic properties interact. Given that the consequences of such failures are potentially deadly, a method to monitor HCTF non-invasively in real-time is expected to be of great use. This method may be realised by a technique to determine the inaccessible temperature distribution of a component since thermal gradients drive HCTF. Previous work showed that a physics-based method called the inverse thermal modelling (ITM) method can obtain the temperature distribution from external temperature and ultrasonic time of flight (TOF) measurements. This study investigated whether the long-short-term memory (LSTM) machine learning architecture could be a faster alternative to the ITM method for data inversion. On experimental data, a 25-member ensemble of LSTM networks achieved an ensemble median root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.04°C and an ensemble median mean error of 0.194°C (both relative to a resistance temperature device measurement). These values are similar to the ITM method which achieved a RMSE of 1.04°C and a mean error of 0.196°C. The single LSTM network and the ITM method achieved a computation-to-real-world time ratio of 0.008% and 14%, respectively demonstrating that both methods can invert data in real-time. Simulation studies revealed that LSTM performance is sensitive to small differences between the training and real-world parameters leading to unacceptable errors. However, these errors can be detected via an ensemble of independent networks and, corrected by simply adding a correction factor to the TOF prior to being input into the networks. The results show that LSTM has the potential to be an alternative to the ITM method; however, the authors favour ITM for temperature distribution monitoring given its interpretability.
利用机器学习和基于物理的方法进行高周热疲劳监测的超声温度监测的比较
在核电站中,由于不同热工性质和水力性质的流体相互作用,高循环热疲劳(HCTF)可能导致所谓混合区的管网部件失效。鉴于此类故障的后果可能是致命的,一种非侵入性实时监测HCTF的方法预计将大有用处。由于热梯度驱动HCTF,该方法可以通过确定组件不可接近的温度分布的技术来实现。以前的研究表明,一种基于物理的方法称为逆热建模(ITM)方法可以从外部温度和超声飞行时间(TOF)测量中获得温度分布。本研究调查了长短期记忆(LSTM)机器学习架构是否可以作为数据反演ITM方法的更快替代方案。在实验数据上,25个LSTM网络的集成中位数均方根误差(RMSE)为1.04°C,集成中位数均方根误差(RMSE)为0.194°C(均相对于电阻温度器件测量)。这些值与ITM方法相似,RMSE为1.04°C,平均误差为0.196°C。单LSTM网络和ITM方法的计算时间与实际时间之比分别为0.008%和14%,表明两种方法都可以实时反演数据。仿真研究表明,LSTM性能对训练参数和真实参数之间的微小差异非常敏感,从而导致不可接受的误差。然而,这些误差可以通过独立网络的集合来检测,并通过在输入到网络之前简单地向TOF添加校正因子来纠正。结果表明,LSTM具有替代ITM方法的潜力;然而,鉴于ITM的可解释性,作者倾向于ITM用于温度分布监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Structural Health Monitoring is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research that contain theoretical, analytical, and experimental investigations that advance the body of knowledge and its application in the discipline of structural health monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信