On the Allocation of Residues Cost using Conventional and Comprehensive Thermoeconomic Diagrams

Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI:10.5541/IJOT.878173
P. Faria, R. Santos, J. J. Santos, M. Barone, B. M. F. Miotto
{"title":"On the Allocation of Residues Cost using Conventional and Comprehensive Thermoeconomic Diagrams","authors":"P. Faria, R. Santos, J. J. Santos, M. Barone, B. M. F. Miotto","doi":"10.5541/IJOT.878173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a productive process, the achievement of products occurs simultaneously with residues generation. Environmental impact of residues is an important issue in energy systems analysis due to environmental regulations and sustainability assessment. Many waste treatment methodologies have been proposed and applied in thermoeconomics. However, this is a complex problem and the solution depends on the residue nature and its formation process. Most conventional methodologies are based on productive diagrams, using productive flows only, and allocate the residues cost among the productive equipment. This work surveys the main conventional methodologies for treatment of waste and presents an improved/updated methodology based on a comprehensive diagram, in which both physical and productive flows are represented and their flows cost are assessed and the subsystems are connected using the same physical flows presented in the flowsheet of the plant. Both the CGAM system and a combined cycle are analyzed. Comparisons are made with literature results, considering the same case studies. The presented methodology obtains consistent results from the point of view of the cost allocation in thermoeconomics. The novelty of this updated approach concerns how the residue cost is allocated in the comprehensive diagram: it is reinternalized in the internal loop of physical flows, instead of in the productive unit. It represents advantages since the equipment product/fuel ratio index is not affected, which is beneficial for thermoeconomic diagnosis application.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5541/IJOT.878173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In a productive process, the achievement of products occurs simultaneously with residues generation. Environmental impact of residues is an important issue in energy systems analysis due to environmental regulations and sustainability assessment. Many waste treatment methodologies have been proposed and applied in thermoeconomics. However, this is a complex problem and the solution depends on the residue nature and its formation process. Most conventional methodologies are based on productive diagrams, using productive flows only, and allocate the residues cost among the productive equipment. This work surveys the main conventional methodologies for treatment of waste and presents an improved/updated methodology based on a comprehensive diagram, in which both physical and productive flows are represented and their flows cost are assessed and the subsystems are connected using the same physical flows presented in the flowsheet of the plant. Both the CGAM system and a combined cycle are analyzed. Comparisons are made with literature results, considering the same case studies. The presented methodology obtains consistent results from the point of view of the cost allocation in thermoeconomics. The novelty of this updated approach concerns how the residue cost is allocated in the comprehensive diagram: it is reinternalized in the internal loop of physical flows, instead of in the productive unit. It represents advantages since the equipment product/fuel ratio index is not affected, which is beneficial for thermoeconomic diagnosis application.
分享
查看原文
利用常规热经济图和综合热经济图研究剩余物成本的分配
在生产过程中,产品的生产与残留物的产生同时发生。由于环境法规和可持续性评估,残留物的环境影响是能源系统分析中的一个重要问题。许多废物处理方法已经被提出并应用于热经济学。然而,这是一个复杂的问题,解决方案取决于残留物的性质及其形成过程。大多数传统方法基于生产图,仅使用生产流程,并在生产设备之间分配剩余成本。这项工作调查了废物处理的主要传统方法,并提出了一种基于综合图的改进/更新方法,其中表示了物理流和生产流,并评估了其流量成本,并且使用工厂流程图中显示的相同物理流连接子系统。对CGAM系统和联合循环进行了分析。考虑到相同的案例研究,将其与文献结果进行了比较。从热经济学成本分配的角度出发,提出的方法获得了一致的结果。这种更新方法的新颖之处在于如何在综合图中分配剩余成本:它在物理流的内部循环中重新内化,而不是在生产单元中。它具有优点,因为设备产品/燃料比指数不受影响,这有利于热经济诊断应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信