Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching.

Irene Gafson, Kanika Sharma, Ann Griffin
{"title":"Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching.","authors":"Irene Gafson, Kanika Sharma, Ann Griffin","doi":"10.7861/fhj.2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High profile cases continue to demonstrate failures to raise concerns with detrimental effects on patient safety. This research sought to establish what educational support junior doctors needed to effectively raise clinical and professional concerns.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A qualitative study with 16 participants taking part in three focus groups. The transcripts were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the data could be coded into four themes: past experiences of teaching; suggested teaching; reporting mechanisms and educational challenges. Most participants were dissatisfied with the teaching they had received on raising concerns. Current systems were thought to be good for raising patient safety issues but not for concerns about professional behaviour of healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for improved education to tackle the way this is taught in postgraduate curricula. Frequent rotations and a lack of meaningful relationships left junior doctors feeling less invested in improving organisational culture. Junior doctors are apprehensive about raising concerns because of personal risk to their career trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High profile cases continue to demonstrate failures to raise concerns with detrimental effects on patient safety. This research sought to establish what educational support junior doctors needed to effectively raise clinical and professional concerns.

Study design: A qualitative study with 16 participants taking part in three focus groups. The transcripts were thematically analysed.

Results: All the data could be coded into four themes: past experiences of teaching; suggested teaching; reporting mechanisms and educational challenges. Most participants were dissatisfied with the teaching they had received on raising concerns. Current systems were thought to be good for raising patient safety issues but not for concerns about professional behaviour of healthcare staff.

Conclusions: There is a need for improved education to tackle the way this is taught in postgraduate curricula. Frequent rotations and a lack of meaningful relationships left junior doctors feeling less invested in improving organisational culture. Junior doctors are apprehensive about raising concerns because of personal risk to their career trajectory.

提高关注在当前的国民保健制度的气候:一项探讨初级医生的态度培训和教学的定性研究
【摘要】背景:一些引人注目的案例继续证明未能引起人们对患者安全不利影响的关注。本研究旨在建立什么样的教育支持初级医生需要有效地提高临床和专业关注。研究设计一项有16名参与者参加三个焦点小组的定性研究。对转录本进行了主题分析。结果所有数据可分为四个主题:过去的教学经历;建议教学;报告机制和教育挑战。大多数参与者都不满意他们所接受的关于提出关注的教育。目前的系统被认为对提高患者安全问题有好处,但对医护人员的专业行为却没有好处。有必要改进教育,以解决研究生课程中这种教学方式。频繁的轮岗和缺乏有意义的人际关系,让初级医生感到在改善组织文化方面投入较少。初级医生担心引起人们的担忧,因为这会给他们的职业发展带来个人风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信