Library Utopias and Dystopias Today and in 2040

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Seadle
{"title":"Library Utopias and Dystopias Today and in 2040","authors":"M. Seadle","doi":"10.1515/bfp-2022-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Open access is a key utopian ideal for a large proportion of librarians, but before discussing libraries in 2040, it is important to define the term “library”. For some readers, a complete shift to electronic reading would be a utopia, especially for those with dyslexia and other reading disabilities since electronic reading offers means for compensating. For those whose utopia is the library building itself as a long-term repository for bound paper volumes, the future offers little hope. The prevalence of book banning attempts and of fake news of all sorts is a symptom of a fundamental distrust in information that is the hallmark of the librarian’s dystopia.","PeriodicalId":42032,"journal":{"name":"Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis","volume":"47 1","pages":"110 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2022-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Open access is a key utopian ideal for a large proportion of librarians, but before discussing libraries in 2040, it is important to define the term “library”. For some readers, a complete shift to electronic reading would be a utopia, especially for those with dyslexia and other reading disabilities since electronic reading offers means for compensating. For those whose utopia is the library building itself as a long-term repository for bound paper volumes, the future offers little hope. The prevalence of book banning attempts and of fake news of all sorts is a symptom of a fundamental distrust in information that is the hallmark of the librarian’s dystopia.
今天和2040年的图书馆乌托邦和反乌托邦
摘要开放获取对大部分图书馆员来说是一个关键的乌托邦理想,但在2040年讨论图书馆之前,定义“图书馆”一词很重要。对一些读者来说,完全转向电子阅读将是一个乌托邦,尤其是对那些有阅读障碍和其他阅读障碍的人来说,因为电子阅读提供了补偿手段。对于那些乌托邦是将图书馆建设成装订纸质书籍的长期储存库的人来说,未来几乎没有希望。禁书企图和各种假新闻的盛行是对信息的根本不信任的症状,这是图书管理员反乌托邦的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信