Genetic Relatedness among Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Samples

S. Ahsan, R. Amin, Anindita Bhowmik
{"title":"Genetic Relatedness among Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Samples","authors":"S. Ahsan, R. Amin, Anindita Bhowmik","doi":"10.3329/bjm.v34i2.39619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common member of the intestinal microbiota in humans and animals is Escherichia coli. Based on the presence of virulence factors, E. coli can be potentially pathogenic. The focus of this study was to determine genotypic diversity among clinical strains of E. coli. Test isolates were identified by biochemical, culture-based and molecular tests. Partial sequence of 16s rDNA was determined by Polymerase Chain Reaction using universal primers. The sequences were used as input in Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to reconfirm the identity of the isolates. Sequences were edited in Chromas and aligned in Bioedit. Afterwards, sequences were fed into Mega 5 and a dendogram was constructed. We used three sequences deposited in GenBank for comparison with our test sequences. It was found that two of our sequences showed similarity to the reference sequences. One of the isolates was similar to a Uropathogenic and a commensal E. coli. The other isolate showed similarity to a UPEC strain. It is possible that both of these isolates were commensal bacteria that led to opportunistic infection in the patients. The rest of the nine strains were different from the reference sequences. These isolates may be opportunistic pathogens that have undergone mutation events leading to sufficiently different rDNA sequences from the reference bacteria. Or they may also be pathogenic strains that caused infection in patients. This study indicated that clinical isolates of E. coli show variation in terms of their rDNA sequences. In order to study their phylogeny, other supporting tools such as investigation for phylogenetic markers, RAPD, ARDRA, ERIC-PCR, ribotyping, etc. may be used to study variation among isolates to a more significant extent. \nBangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 34 Number 2 December 2017, pp 97-101","PeriodicalId":84251,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh journal of microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v34i2.39619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common member of the intestinal microbiota in humans and animals is Escherichia coli. Based on the presence of virulence factors, E. coli can be potentially pathogenic. The focus of this study was to determine genotypic diversity among clinical strains of E. coli. Test isolates were identified by biochemical, culture-based and molecular tests. Partial sequence of 16s rDNA was determined by Polymerase Chain Reaction using universal primers. The sequences were used as input in Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to reconfirm the identity of the isolates. Sequences were edited in Chromas and aligned in Bioedit. Afterwards, sequences were fed into Mega 5 and a dendogram was constructed. We used three sequences deposited in GenBank for comparison with our test sequences. It was found that two of our sequences showed similarity to the reference sequences. One of the isolates was similar to a Uropathogenic and a commensal E. coli. The other isolate showed similarity to a UPEC strain. It is possible that both of these isolates were commensal bacteria that led to opportunistic infection in the patients. The rest of the nine strains were different from the reference sequences. These isolates may be opportunistic pathogens that have undergone mutation events leading to sufficiently different rDNA sequences from the reference bacteria. Or they may also be pathogenic strains that caused infection in patients. This study indicated that clinical isolates of E. coli show variation in terms of their rDNA sequences. In order to study their phylogeny, other supporting tools such as investigation for phylogenetic markers, RAPD, ARDRA, ERIC-PCR, ribotyping, etc. may be used to study variation among isolates to a more significant extent. Bangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 34 Number 2 December 2017, pp 97-101
临床样品中大肠杆菌的遗传相关性
大肠杆菌是人类和动物肠道微生物群中的一个常见成员。基于毒力因子的存在,大肠杆菌可能具有潜在的致病性。本研究的重点是确定大肠杆菌临床菌株的基因型多样性。通过生物化学、培养基和分子测试鉴定测试分离物。用通用引物聚合酶链式反应测定16s rDNA的部分序列。将该序列用作基本局部比对搜索工具(BLAST)的输入,以再次确认分离物的身份。序列在Chromas中编辑,并在Bioedit中对齐。然后,将序列加入Mega 5中,构建树状图。我们使用了存放在GenBank中的三个序列与我们的测试序列进行比较。研究发现,我们的两个序列与参考序列显示出相似性。其中一个分离株与泌尿系致病性大肠杆菌和共生大肠杆菌相似。另一个分离株显示出与UPEC菌株的相似性。这两种分离物可能都是导致患者机会性感染的共生细菌。其余9个菌株与参考序列不同。这些分离物可能是机会性病原体,其经历了导致与参考细菌的rDNA序列充分不同的突变事件。或者它们也可能是导致患者感染的致病菌株。这项研究表明,临床分离的大肠杆菌在其rDNA序列方面表现出变异。为了研究它们的系统发育,可以使用其他支持工具,如系统发育标记研究、RAPD、ARDRA、ERIC-PCR、核糖分型等,在更大程度上研究分离株之间的变异。孟加拉国微生物学杂志,第34卷第2期,2017年12月,第97-101页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书