Systematic Review Training Model for Education Librarians: A Case Study

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
A. Kogut, Diana Ramirez, M. Foster
{"title":"Systematic Review Training Model for Education Librarians: A Case Study","authors":"A. Kogut, Diana Ramirez, M. Foster","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Education librarians are receiving an increasing number of requests to help researchers with systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are evidence syntheses that require comprehensive, reproducible search strategies. Many of the available training programs and materials focus on systematic reviews in the health sciences, not education or the social sciences. Therefore, librarians at Texas A&M University Libraries developed and implemented a training model designed specifically for education librarians. The model consists of three components: shadowing, community of practice, and research projects. In this case study, we discuss the model, provide our reflections on the training, and describe how the model can be modified to fit other institutional contexts and social sciences disciplines.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"205 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Education librarians are receiving an increasing number of requests to help researchers with systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are evidence syntheses that require comprehensive, reproducible search strategies. Many of the available training programs and materials focus on systematic reviews in the health sciences, not education or the social sciences. Therefore, librarians at Texas A&M University Libraries developed and implemented a training model designed specifically for education librarians. The model consists of three components: shadowing, community of practice, and research projects. In this case study, we discuss the model, provide our reflections on the training, and describe how the model can be modified to fit other institutional contexts and social sciences disciplines.
教育图书馆员的系统评审培训模式:个案研究
教育图书馆员正收到越来越多的帮助研究人员进行系统评论的请求。系统评价是证据综合,需要全面的、可重复的搜索策略。许多现有的培训项目和材料侧重于健康科学的系统审查,而不是教育或社会科学。因此,德克萨斯A&M大学图书馆的图书馆员开发并实施了专门为教育图书馆员设计的培训模式。该模型由三个部分组成:实习、实践社区和研究项目。在本案例研究中,我们讨论了该模型,提供了我们对培训的思考,并描述了如何修改该模型以适应其他制度背景和社会科学学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信