Analysis of paralytic shellfish toxins in seafood by liquid chromatography: A critical review of the methodologies developed

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sergio Santana-Viera, Pablo A. Lara-Martin
{"title":"Analysis of paralytic shellfish toxins in seafood by liquid chromatography: A critical review of the methodologies developed","authors":"Sergio Santana-Viera,&nbsp;Pablo A. Lara-Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) are natural toxins produced by some microorganisms, especially during harmful algal blooms (HABs). Molluscs and other marine animals can accumulate significant amounts of these toxins, causing food poisoning. Due to the seriousness of this poisoning, the European Union has established a concentration limit and an official method based on liquid chromatography for their analysis. PSTs are very challenging analytes due to their very high polarity and occurrence of different isomers with varying toxicity towards humans. Current available </span>extraction methods are adapted from a previous existing bioassay and not fully validated yet. Recovery efficiencies of the extraction procedure are occasionally low, and further clean-up can lead to highly variable results depending on the toxin and the matrix analysed. Detection of PSTs by mass spectrometry offers the ability to identify all toxins in a single analysis, which is an improvement over the current official method based on fluorescence detection prior </span>derivatisation<span>. As a drawback, normal phase chromatography is required, which tend to be less robust that more conventionally used reversed-phase chromatography used in the official method. New extraction techniques and recent advances in the mass spectrometry field (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion mobility) have been barely applied yet to the analysis of PSTs. An increase in the frequency and extension of HABs due to global warming will lead to more severe impacts on health, environment and economy in coastal areas. An improvement of current existing analytical methods is therefore needed to allow for a faster and more accurate monitoring of PSTs.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221415882200037X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) are natural toxins produced by some microorganisms, especially during harmful algal blooms (HABs). Molluscs and other marine animals can accumulate significant amounts of these toxins, causing food poisoning. Due to the seriousness of this poisoning, the European Union has established a concentration limit and an official method based on liquid chromatography for their analysis. PSTs are very challenging analytes due to their very high polarity and occurrence of different isomers with varying toxicity towards humans. Current available extraction methods are adapted from a previous existing bioassay and not fully validated yet. Recovery efficiencies of the extraction procedure are occasionally low, and further clean-up can lead to highly variable results depending on the toxin and the matrix analysed. Detection of PSTs by mass spectrometry offers the ability to identify all toxins in a single analysis, which is an improvement over the current official method based on fluorescence detection prior derivatisation. As a drawback, normal phase chromatography is required, which tend to be less robust that more conventionally used reversed-phase chromatography used in the official method. New extraction techniques and recent advances in the mass spectrometry field (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion mobility) have been barely applied yet to the analysis of PSTs. An increase in the frequency and extension of HABs due to global warming will lead to more severe impacts on health, environment and economy in coastal areas. An improvement of current existing analytical methods is therefore needed to allow for a faster and more accurate monitoring of PSTs.

液相色谱法分析海产品中麻痹性贝类毒素的研究进展
麻痹性贝类毒素(PSTs)是由一些微生物产生的天然毒素,特别是在有害藻华(HABs)期间。软体动物和其他海洋动物可以积累大量的这些毒素,导致食物中毒。由于这种中毒的严重性,欧盟已经建立了浓度限制和基于液相色谱法的官方分析方法。pst是非常具有挑战性的分析物,因为它们具有非常高的极性和对人类具有不同毒性的不同异构体。目前可用的提取方法改编自先前现有的生物测定,尚未完全验证。萃取过程的回收效率有时很低,进一步的清理可能导致高度可变的结果,这取决于毒素和分析的基质。质谱法检测PSTs提供了在一次分析中识别所有毒素的能力,这是对当前基于荧光检测先验衍生化的官方方法的改进。作为一个缺点,常规相色谱法是必需的,这往往是不太强大的,更传统地使用反相色谱法在官方方法中使用。新的提取技术和质谱领域的最新进展(如高分辨率质谱和离子迁移率)几乎没有应用于PSTs的分析。由于全球变暖,有害藻华发生频率的增加和范围的扩大将对沿海地区的健康、环境和经济造成更严重的影响。因此,需要改进现有的分析方法,以便更快、更准确地监测pst。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信