Comparison of S-Parameter Measurement Methods for Adapters

IF 0.6 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
K. Kuhlmann, Frauke K. H. Gellersen, Meike Tschauder
{"title":"Comparison of S-Parameter Measurement Methods for Adapters","authors":"K. Kuhlmann, Frauke K. H. Gellersen, Meike Tschauder","doi":"10.5194/ars-20-1-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this work two methods for the characterization of adapters meaning reciprocal two-ports with different connector styles on both ports are analyzed and compared in detail. The focus is on the comparison of these approaches in terms of required effort and obtained measurement uncertainty. The first method is based on two one-port calibrations and it is compared to a two-port approach. Both methods are carried out in simulation as well as in measurement under very comparable conditions using a 2.4 to 3.5 mm adapter in the frequency range up to 33 GHz as an example. The obtained measurement uncertainties of the results are presented and analyzed, the required measurement time in terms of the necessary number of separate connections is compared, and the influence of cable movements is discussed.\n","PeriodicalId":45093,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radio Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radio Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-20-1-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In this work two methods for the characterization of adapters meaning reciprocal two-ports with different connector styles on both ports are analyzed and compared in detail. The focus is on the comparison of these approaches in terms of required effort and obtained measurement uncertainty. The first method is based on two one-port calibrations and it is compared to a two-port approach. Both methods are carried out in simulation as well as in measurement under very comparable conditions using a 2.4 to 3.5 mm adapter in the frequency range up to 33 GHz as an example. The obtained measurement uncertainties of the results are presented and analyzed, the required measurement time in terms of the necessary number of separate connections is compared, and the influence of cable movements is discussed.
适配器s参数测量方法的比较
摘要在这项工作中,适配器的两种表征方法,即在两个端口上具有不同连接器样式的对等双端口,进行了详细的分析和比较。重点是根据所需的工作量和获得的测量不确定度对这些方法进行比较。第一种方法基于两个单端口校准,并将其与双端口方法进行比较。这两种方法都在非常相似的条件下进行了仿真和测量,使用频率范围高达33 GHz的2.4至3.5 mm适配器作为示例。给出并分析了所得结果的测量不确定度,比较了按必要的分离连接数计算所需的测量时间,并讨论了电缆运动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Radio Science
Advances in Radio Science ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信