Las intervenciones arquitectónicas en el Palacio del Almirante de Aragón en Valencia (principios del siglo XX)

IF 1.6 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY
Antonio Miguel Gómez Gil
{"title":"Las intervenciones arquitectónicas en el Palacio del Almirante de Aragón en Valencia (principios del siglo XX)","authors":"Antonio Miguel Gómez Gil","doi":"10.4995/var.2020.11441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl actual Palacio del Almirante de Aragon, en Valencia (Espana), monumento historico artistico desde 1944, es el resultado de la suma de varias intervenciones arquitectonicas a lo largo del tiempo. Tradicionalmente y a nivel disciplinar, se ha tomado este edificio como un paradigma de los palacios bajomedievales, construidos en los territorios del antiguo imperio aragones. Los principales elementos arquitectonicos existentes en este monumento, incluso en epoca moderna, se han considerado como originales, o al menos ejecutados durante el siglo XVI. Este extremo tiene su explicacion en que dichas intervenciones se realizaron “en estilo” y con pericia, tal como se solia hacer en aquella epoca en nuestro pais. Este articulo da cuenta de una serie de obras efectuadas en el edificio, todas ellas desconocidas, durante la primera parte del siglo XX (1902-1935). Estas obras, anteriores a una actuacion integral e institucional realizada en 1987, afectaron a su patio, pero tambien alteraron de forma importante el volumen del edificio. El texto, apoyandose en documentacion inedita, identifica y data estas intervenciones, aclarando a los autores y los trabajos acometidos. Se presta especial atencion al patio central del palacio, como elemento claramente singularizador del monumento. La investigacion se ha apoyado, en una busqueda documental en archivos, publicos y privados, asi como en un detenido estudio de los elementos alterados, en visitas al propio edificio. Para comprobar con mayor claridad la evolucion y el alcance de las antedichas intervenciones, se han interpretado con modelados graficos en 3D, tanto en el caso del patio como en el del volumen de todo el edificio. Estos modelados dan una idea bastante exacta de sus distintas fases de transformacion hasta adoptar su aspecto actual.Highlights:En este articulo se aclara documentalmente que elementos del patio del palacio de los Almirantes de Aragon se cambiaron y/o anadieron en la primera mitad del siglo XX.Se realiza un estudio evolutivo del monumento que se centra con detalle en el patio del palacio, pero tambien se acomete un estudio general de la evolucion volumetrica del edificio.El estudio, que se plantea desde un punto de vista cientifico, se basa en un trabajo de archivos exhaustivo, manejando documentacion completamente inedita y visitando el monumento. EnglishThe Palace of the Admirals of Aragon is in the city of Valencia, Spain. It was built in the Gothic style of the Valencian self-governing period, and has always been an “architectonic type” reference of this era. Referring to the building itself, there are two elements to highlight because of their interest. The first is its courtyard, which fits into the developed standards in all states of the old Crown of Aragon, talking about either the ones currently in Spain or those existing in France or Italy. Because of that, researchers came up with the term “Mediterranean Gothic” to define this style, since there are currently different geographic regions belonging to different countries. This courtyard will be the main research objective of this paper; it was designed before the ground floor, first floor and small attic interventions. The second element which makes this building unique is its ceilings of carved painted woodwork. Until the present day, this Palace has only been refurbishment once (in 1987), according to written records. The aim of this paper is to show that even though the courtyard has always been used as the best way to show the Valencian Gothic style, many of its elements were added in the first half of the 20th Century. In this research, it can be deduced that there were at least three technicians in the period between 1902 and the late 30s. Surveyor Salvador Furio, who simply put some order into interior partitions where a Gothic spiral staircase was demolished, carried out the first intervention. In the late 1920s, the work was taken over by architect Joaquin Rieta Sister, who was responsible for the restoration of the original state of the courtyard, whose ground floor arcs had been blinded before Rieta’s intervention. He opened these arcs by creating new wall gaps and installing regular windows there. This architect also removed some of the closed rooms on the ground floor, which were used for storage. Finally, he demolished the upper floor facade, turning the attic into a balcony using metallic handrails. After Rieta, architect Antonio Gomez Davo took charge of the work. He kept working on the courtyard, removing the last storage room left, and making three new gaps in the east facade, inspired by existing Neogothic doors. He demolished Rieta’s balconies and turned the upper floor into a useful space that met the requirements of the building to be used as a school. Gomez Davo increased the building’s height by turning this upper floor into a closed space and reconstructed the ashlar wall adding bilobed Gothic windows. From that moment, the courtyard was composed of a ground floor and two full upper floors. Both Rieta’s interventions, as well as the one carried out by Gomez, can be considered “in style”, as it was the ruling fashion at that moment to refurbish historic buildings, at least in Spain.It is interesting to highlight the new or refurbished works by Gomez due to the treatment given to the edges, so the new can be identified against the old. After the intervention by Rieta that turned the attic into a balcony, and after its demolition, there was a horizontal joint left which clearly crosses all the way through the patio’s perimeter. This part also shows a modern intervention treatment for its horizontality and by using new and lighter colour stone in the new attic enclosure, so both areas can be distinguishable.The intervention carried out by Gomez was not only focused on the courtyard as Rieta did. In his archives, there is plenty of written and graphic material to approximate his interventions in this monument. Although the main objective of this research is to show the courtyard’s modern changes as the Palace’s singular element, it has attempted to reflect these interventions briefly, in the attached appendix. For this reason, 3D models of the patio and building have been built to give the most accurate idea of what happened to the building over time. The modelling of the courtyard includes three historical moments: before the intervention of Rieta, after the intervention of Rieta, and after the intervention of Gomez. The modelling of the building includes prior to the intervention of Gomez, after his intervention, before the 1987 intervention, and after its completion. The text also reflects on the danger of interventions “in style”, since these elements have been mistaken for the original ones and therefore may have caused confusion among researchers. Today, progress has been made in favour of historical truthfulness thanks to the participation of archaeologists, restorers to the traditional teams of architects and surveyors, who were dedicated exclusively to these works. Now we may have a different and perhaps more specialized vision in some aspects, thus ensuring a better result of the work.","PeriodicalId":44206,"journal":{"name":"Virtual Archaeology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual Archaeology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.11441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolEl actual Palacio del Almirante de Aragon, en Valencia (Espana), monumento historico artistico desde 1944, es el resultado de la suma de varias intervenciones arquitectonicas a lo largo del tiempo. Tradicionalmente y a nivel disciplinar, se ha tomado este edificio como un paradigma de los palacios bajomedievales, construidos en los territorios del antiguo imperio aragones. Los principales elementos arquitectonicos existentes en este monumento, incluso en epoca moderna, se han considerado como originales, o al menos ejecutados durante el siglo XVI. Este extremo tiene su explicacion en que dichas intervenciones se realizaron “en estilo” y con pericia, tal como se solia hacer en aquella epoca en nuestro pais. Este articulo da cuenta de una serie de obras efectuadas en el edificio, todas ellas desconocidas, durante la primera parte del siglo XX (1902-1935). Estas obras, anteriores a una actuacion integral e institucional realizada en 1987, afectaron a su patio, pero tambien alteraron de forma importante el volumen del edificio. El texto, apoyandose en documentacion inedita, identifica y data estas intervenciones, aclarando a los autores y los trabajos acometidos. Se presta especial atencion al patio central del palacio, como elemento claramente singularizador del monumento. La investigacion se ha apoyado, en una busqueda documental en archivos, publicos y privados, asi como en un detenido estudio de los elementos alterados, en visitas al propio edificio. Para comprobar con mayor claridad la evolucion y el alcance de las antedichas intervenciones, se han interpretado con modelados graficos en 3D, tanto en el caso del patio como en el del volumen de todo el edificio. Estos modelados dan una idea bastante exacta de sus distintas fases de transformacion hasta adoptar su aspecto actual.Highlights:En este articulo se aclara documentalmente que elementos del patio del palacio de los Almirantes de Aragon se cambiaron y/o anadieron en la primera mitad del siglo XX.Se realiza un estudio evolutivo del monumento que se centra con detalle en el patio del palacio, pero tambien se acomete un estudio general de la evolucion volumetrica del edificio.El estudio, que se plantea desde un punto de vista cientifico, se basa en un trabajo de archivos exhaustivo, manejando documentacion completamente inedita y visitando el monumento. EnglishThe Palace of the Admirals of Aragon is in the city of Valencia, Spain. It was built in the Gothic style of the Valencian self-governing period, and has always been an “architectonic type” reference of this era. Referring to the building itself, there are two elements to highlight because of their interest. The first is its courtyard, which fits into the developed standards in all states of the old Crown of Aragon, talking about either the ones currently in Spain or those existing in France or Italy. Because of that, researchers came up with the term “Mediterranean Gothic” to define this style, since there are currently different geographic regions belonging to different countries. This courtyard will be the main research objective of this paper; it was designed before the ground floor, first floor and small attic interventions. The second element which makes this building unique is its ceilings of carved painted woodwork. Until the present day, this Palace has only been refurbishment once (in 1987), according to written records. The aim of this paper is to show that even though the courtyard has always been used as the best way to show the Valencian Gothic style, many of its elements were added in the first half of the 20th Century. In this research, it can be deduced that there were at least three technicians in the period between 1902 and the late 30s. Surveyor Salvador Furio, who simply put some order into interior partitions where a Gothic spiral staircase was demolished, carried out the first intervention. In the late 1920s, the work was taken over by architect Joaquin Rieta Sister, who was responsible for the restoration of the original state of the courtyard, whose ground floor arcs had been blinded before Rieta’s intervention. He opened these arcs by creating new wall gaps and installing regular windows there. This architect also removed some of the closed rooms on the ground floor, which were used for storage. Finally, he demolished the upper floor facade, turning the attic into a balcony using metallic handrails. After Rieta, architect Antonio Gomez Davo took charge of the work. He kept working on the courtyard, removing the last storage room left, and making three new gaps in the east facade, inspired by existing Neogothic doors. He demolished Rieta’s balconies and turned the upper floor into a useful space that met the requirements of the building to be used as a school. Gomez Davo increased the building’s height by turning this upper floor into a closed space and reconstructed the ashlar wall adding bilobed Gothic windows. From that moment, the courtyard was composed of a ground floor and two full upper floors. Both Rieta’s interventions, as well as the one carried out by Gomez, can be considered “in style”, as it was the ruling fashion at that moment to refurbish historic buildings, at least in Spain.It is interesting to highlight the new or refurbished works by Gomez due to the treatment given to the edges, so the new can be identified against the old. After the intervention by Rieta that turned the attic into a balcony, and after its demolition, there was a horizontal joint left which clearly crosses all the way through the patio’s perimeter. This part also shows a modern intervention treatment for its horizontality and by using new and lighter colour stone in the new attic enclosure, so both areas can be distinguishable.The intervention carried out by Gomez was not only focused on the courtyard as Rieta did. In his archives, there is plenty of written and graphic material to approximate his interventions in this monument. Although the main objective of this research is to show the courtyard’s modern changes as the Palace’s singular element, it has attempted to reflect these interventions briefly, in the attached appendix. For this reason, 3D models of the patio and building have been built to give the most accurate idea of what happened to the building over time. The modelling of the courtyard includes three historical moments: before the intervention of Rieta, after the intervention of Rieta, and after the intervention of Gomez. The modelling of the building includes prior to the intervention of Gomez, after his intervention, before the 1987 intervention, and after its completion. The text also reflects on the danger of interventions “in style”, since these elements have been mistaken for the original ones and therefore may have caused confusion among researchers. Today, progress has been made in favour of historical truthfulness thanks to the participation of archaeologists, restorers to the traditional teams of architects and surveyors, who were dedicated exclusively to these works. Now we may have a different and perhaps more specialized vision in some aspects, thus ensuring a better result of the work.
瓦伦西亚阿拉贡海军上将宫殿的建筑干预(20世纪初)
目前位于西班牙巴伦西亚的阿拉贡海军上将宫(Palacio del Almirante de Aragon),自1944年以来一直是历史艺术纪念碑,是多年来各种建筑干预的结果。传统上,在学科层面上,这座建筑被视为中世纪晚期宫殿的典范,建于古阿拉贡帝国的领土上。这座纪念碑的主要建筑元素,即使在现代,也被认为是原始的,或至少是在16世纪执行的。这一事实可以解释为,这些干预措施是“有风格的”和专业的,就像当时在我国通常做的那样。这篇文章描述了在20世纪早期(1902-1935),在这座建筑中进行的一系列不为人知的工作。这些作品,在1987年完成的整体和机构行动之前,影响了它的庭院,但也显著地改变了建筑的体积。本文以文献为基础,对这些干预措施进行了识别和数据收集,澄清了作者和所涉及的工作。特别注意宫殿的中央庭院,作为纪念碑的独特元素。这项研究是基于对公共和私人档案的文献搜索,以及对改变元素的仔细研究,以及对建筑本身的访问。为了更清楚地检查上述干预措施的演变和范围,他们用3D图形建模来解释,无论是在庭院的情况下,还是在整个建筑的体量。这些模型提供了一个相当准确的想法,不同的转换阶段,直到采用它现在的外观。亮点:这篇文章记录了阿拉贡海军上将宫殿庭院的元素在20世纪上半叶被改变和/或增加。对纪念碑进行了进化研究,重点是宫殿庭院的细节,但也对建筑的体量进化进行了一般研究。这项研究从科学的角度提出,是基于详尽的档案工作,处理完全未出版的文件和参观纪念碑。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该镇的土地面积为。It was built in the Gothic style of the Valencian self-governing period, and always得到an“architectonic type of this是参考。具体指的是the building本身,there are two》强调是因为其利益。第一个是它的courtyard,它符合所有国家的标准,旧的皇冠阿拉贡,关于西班牙或法国或意大利的标准。是因为,研究来up with the“地中海Gothic”一词定义这个style, there are目前不同地理区域不同国家应。这个庭院将是本文的主要研究目标;= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的总面积为,其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。The second element提出了this building unique is its ceilings of carved在我woodwork。直到目前day this宫仅得到11 refurbishment in 1987),根据书面记录。这篇论文的目的是表明,尽管庭院一直被用作展示瓦伦西亚哥特式风格的最佳方式,但它的许多元素在20世纪的前半期被添加了。In this research, it can be deduced是至少三technicians In the period 1902年与30s跳动。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为,其中土地面积为,其中土地面积为。在20世纪20年代后期,建筑师Joaquin Rieta Sister接管了这项工作,他负责修复庭院的原始状态,在Rieta的工作之前,它的地板拱门已经被蒙住了。我opened这些arcs by creating new wall差距和定期installing windows里面。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的总面积为,其中土地和(2.641平方公里)水。最后,我demolished the上floor facade,将发展为balcony using the attic metallic handrails。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查局的数据,该县的总面积为,其中土地和(1.)水。我维持着working on the courtyard、办公室以及the最后storage房间left and making in the east facade三new差距,inspired by existing Neogothic doors。我demolished Rieta balconies,以及在转上floor有用space into that met the requirements of the building to be用作学校。戈麦斯Davo增加了the building ' s height by将发展this为已关闭上floor space and reconstructed the ashlar wall adding bilobed Gothic windows。 从那一刻起,庭院由一层和两层完整的上层组成。无论是Rieta的设计,还是Gomez的设计,都可以被认为是“时髦的”,因为当时修缮历史建筑是主流时尚,至少在西班牙是这样。由于对边缘的处理,突出Gomez的新作品或翻新作品是很有趣的,因此可以将新作品与旧作品区分开来。在Rieta的干预下,阁楼变成了一个阳台,在拆除后,有一个水平连接,清晰地穿过庭院的周边。该部分还展示了其水平的现代干预处理,并在新的阁楼围护结构中使用了新的浅色石材,因此两个区域可以区分开来。戈麦斯进行的干预并不像丽塔那样只关注庭院。在他的档案中,有大量的书面和图形材料可以近似地描述他对这座纪念碑的干预。虽然这项研究的主要目的是展示庭院作为宫殿的单一元素的现代变化,但它试图在附件中简要地反映这些干预。出于这个原因,已经建立了庭院和建筑的3D模型,以最准确地了解随着时间的推移,建筑发生了什么。庭院的造型包括三个历史时刻:Rieta介入之前,Rieta介入之后,Gomez介入之后。建筑的建模包括Gomez介入之前、介入之后、1987年介入之前和完成之后。文章还反映了“时髦”干预的危险,因为这些因素被误认为是原始的,因此可能会引起研究人员的混淆。今天,由于考古学家、修复师和传统的建筑师和测量师团队的参与,在有利于历史真实性方面取得了进展,他们专门致力于这些工作。现在我们可能在某些方面有了不同的,也许更专业的视野,从而保证了更好的工作效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.70%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Virtual Archaeology Review (VAR) aims the publication of original papers, interdisciplinary reviews and essays on the new discipline of virtual archaeology, which is continuously evolving and currently on its way to achieve scientific consolidation. In fact, Virtual Archaeology deals with the digital representation of historical heritage objects, buildings and landscapes through 3D acquisition, digital recording and interactive and immersive tools for analysis, interpretation, dissemination and communication purposes by means of multidimensional geometric properties and visual computational modelling. VAR will publish full-length original papers which reflect both current research and practice throughout the world, in order to contribute to the advancement of the new field of virtual archaeology, ranging from new ways of digital recording and documentation, advanced reconstruction and 3D modelling up to cyber-archaeology, virtual exhibitions and serious gaming. Thus acceptable material may emerge from interesting applications as well as from original developments or research. OBJECTIVES: - OFFER researchers working in the field of virtual archaeology and cultural heritage an appropriate editorial frame to publish state-of-the-art research works, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions. - GATHER virtual archaeology progresses achieved as a new international scientific discipline. - ENCOURAGE the publication of the latest, state-of-the-art, significant research and meaningful applications in the field of virtual archaeology. - ENHANCE international connections in the field of virtual archaeology and cultural heritage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信