Rebuttal to Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the American Psychological Association's practice guidelines for boys and men

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ronald F. Levant , Ryon C. McDermott , Fredric E. Rabinowitz , Matt Englar-Carlson , Christopher T.H. Liang , Christopher Kilmartin
{"title":"Rebuttal to Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the American Psychological Association's practice guidelines for boys and men","authors":"Ronald F. Levant ,&nbsp;Ryon C. McDermott ,&nbsp;Fredric E. Rabinowitz ,&nbsp;Matt Englar-Carlson ,&nbsp;Christopher T.H. Liang ,&nbsp;Christopher Kilmartin","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We played significant roles in the development of the <span><em>APA</em><em> Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men</em></span><span> (American Psychological Association, 2018). We address Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the Guidelines, making six points: Criticisms of the Guidelines Tend to Reflect Anti-Feminist and Gender Essentialist Perspectives; The Guidelines Followed All Rules and Regulations Set Forth by the APA; The Guidelines Are Routinely Mischaracterized and Distorted By People Who Disagree with Them; APA Guidelines Are not Research Reports, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses; Ferguson Conflates Men With Masculinity; and Ferguson Makes Bold Claims Without Justification or a Familiarity with the Field.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We played significant roles in the development of the APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men (American Psychological Association, 2018). We address Christopher J. Ferguson's critique of the Guidelines, making six points: Criticisms of the Guidelines Tend to Reflect Anti-Feminist and Gender Essentialist Perspectives; The Guidelines Followed All Rules and Regulations Set Forth by the APA; The Guidelines Are Routinely Mischaracterized and Distorted By People Who Disagree with Them; APA Guidelines Are not Research Reports, Systematic Reviews, or Meta-Analyses; Ferguson Conflates Men With Masculinity; and Ferguson Makes Bold Claims Without Justification or a Familiarity with the Field.

反驳克里斯托弗·j·弗格森对美国心理协会针对男孩和男人的实践指南的批评
我们在APA男孩和男人心理实践指南的制定中发挥了重要作用(美国心理协会,2018)。我们针对克里斯托弗·j·弗格森对《指导方针》的批评,提出了六点:对《指导方针》的批评倾向于反映反女权主义和性别本质主义的观点;该指南遵循APA制定的所有规则和条例;这些指导方针经常被持不同意见的人误解和歪曲;APA指南不是研究报告、系统评价或元分析;弗格森将男人与男子气概混为一谈;弗格森在没有正当理由或不熟悉这个领域的情况下发表了大胆的言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信