Quality assessment for methodological aspects of microplastics analysis in soil

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sarva Mangala Praveena , Ahmad Zaharin Aris , Veer Singh
{"title":"Quality assessment for methodological aspects of microplastics analysis in soil","authors":"Sarva Mangala Praveena ,&nbsp;Ahmad Zaharin Aris ,&nbsp;Veer Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the last several years, a number of studies have concentrated on the occurrence, potential sources, and ecological implications of soil systems. However, the studies’ methodological aspects have received little attention. Thus, this study performed a quality assessment for the methodological aspects of soil microplastics studies by adopting the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED) evaluation method. A total of 35 soil microplastic studies have been evaluated in terms of methodological aspects using 13 criteria, namely, sampling methods and strategy, sample processing and storage, sample size, laboratory preparation, clean air conditions, chemical purity, negative control, positive control, sample pre-treatment, microplastics particle data, particle size, particle shape and polymer type identification. The quality assessment findings indicated that no study scored a maximum of two in all criteria, reiterating the urgent need for enhanced quality assurance for future soil microplastics studies. The average quality assessment scores in soil microplastics studies also indicated that the conditions requiring the most improvement involve both the criteria of positive controls and the criteria of clean air conditions. With a value of zero in 13 assessed criterion, the relevance of the study’s findings in environmental risk assessment was restricted, suggesting that future studies should consider strengthening the implementation and reporting of QA/QC protocol. Adoption of proper quality assurance and contamination control measures will guarantee high data quality and establish confidence in the study’s findings, which allow for reproducibility and comparability as well as acceptability to be utilized in risk assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221415882200006X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Over the last several years, a number of studies have concentrated on the occurrence, potential sources, and ecological implications of soil systems. However, the studies’ methodological aspects have received little attention. Thus, this study performed a quality assessment for the methodological aspects of soil microplastics studies by adopting the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED) evaluation method. A total of 35 soil microplastic studies have been evaluated in terms of methodological aspects using 13 criteria, namely, sampling methods and strategy, sample processing and storage, sample size, laboratory preparation, clean air conditions, chemical purity, negative control, positive control, sample pre-treatment, microplastics particle data, particle size, particle shape and polymer type identification. The quality assessment findings indicated that no study scored a maximum of two in all criteria, reiterating the urgent need for enhanced quality assurance for future soil microplastics studies. The average quality assessment scores in soil microplastics studies also indicated that the conditions requiring the most improvement involve both the criteria of positive controls and the criteria of clean air conditions. With a value of zero in 13 assessed criterion, the relevance of the study’s findings in environmental risk assessment was restricted, suggesting that future studies should consider strengthening the implementation and reporting of QA/QC protocol. Adoption of proper quality assurance and contamination control measures will guarantee high data quality and establish confidence in the study’s findings, which allow for reproducibility and comparability as well as acceptability to be utilized in risk assessments.

土壤中微塑料分析方法学方面的质量评价
在过去的几年里,许多研究集中在土壤系统的发生、潜在来源和生态影响上。然而,这些研究的方法方面很少受到关注。因此,本研究通过采用生态毒性数据报告和评估标准(CRED)评估方法,对土壤微塑料研究的方法学方面进行了质量评估。共有35项土壤微塑料研究在方法学方面进行了评估,采用了13项标准,即采样方法和策略、样品处理和储存、样品大小、实验室准备、清洁空气条件、化学纯度、阴性对照、阳性对照、样品预处理、微塑料颗粒数据、颗粒大小、颗粒形状和聚合物类型鉴定。质量评估结果表明,没有一项研究在所有标准中获得最高2分,重申迫切需要加强对未来土壤微塑料研究的质量保证。土壤微塑料研究的平均质量评估分数也表明,最需要改善的条件包括阳性控制标准和清洁空气条件标准。13项评价标准为零,限制了研究结果在环境风险评价中的相关性,建议今后的研究应考虑加强QA/QC方案的实施和报告。采取适当的质量保证和污染控制措施将保证高数据质量,并建立对研究结果的信心,从而允许在风险评估中利用可重复性和可比性以及可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信