Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2022-02-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-7-43-2022
Kristoffer Riemer, Jeppe Lange
{"title":"Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.","authors":"Kristoffer Riemer, Jeppe Lange","doi":"10.5194/jbji-7-43-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Early periprosthetic hip joint infection (PJI) is traditionally treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). However, infection control rates after DAIR-treated periprosthetic hip joint infection do not exceed 77 %. Cementless one-stage revision of chronic PJI by the Cementless One-stage Revision of Infected Hip Arthroplasty (CORIHA) protocol has been evaluated positively with a 91 % success rate. We wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of cementless one-stage revision following the CORIHA protocol for early PJI in elective primary total hip arthroplasty, regarding risk of re-operation with exchange of implants. <b>Methods</b>: We identified 18 patients in our center with early ( <math><mrow><mo>≤</mo> <mn>6</mn></mrow> </math> -week postoperative) PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) treated with one-stage cementless revision in the period January 2012-March 2018. Treatment followed the CORIHA protocol. Primary outcome was retention of implants at the most recent follow-up. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. <b>Results</b>: Mean follow-up time was 60 months (39-105). All patients retained their implants, but two required superficial soft tissue debridement due to persistent wound seepage. <b>Conclusion</b>: Cementless one-stage revision appears to be an effective treatment of early PJI after primary THA and at least an equal choice of treatment compared with DAIR. Whether the potential benefit of a lower re-revision rate for postoperative PJI outweighs the increased surgical complexity of the CORIHA procedure needs further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-43-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early periprosthetic hip joint infection (PJI) is traditionally treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). However, infection control rates after DAIR-treated periprosthetic hip joint infection do not exceed 77 %. Cementless one-stage revision of chronic PJI by the Cementless One-stage Revision of Infected Hip Arthroplasty (CORIHA) protocol has been evaluated positively with a 91 % success rate. We wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of cementless one-stage revision following the CORIHA protocol for early PJI in elective primary total hip arthroplasty, regarding risk of re-operation with exchange of implants. Methods: We identified 18 patients in our center with early ( 6 -week postoperative) PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) treated with one-stage cementless revision in the period January 2012-March 2018. Treatment followed the CORIHA protocol. Primary outcome was retention of implants at the most recent follow-up. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 60 months (39-105). All patients retained their implants, but two required superficial soft tissue debridement due to persistent wound seepage. Conclusion: Cementless one-stage revision appears to be an effective treatment of early PJI after primary THA and at least an equal choice of treatment compared with DAIR. Whether the potential benefit of a lower re-revision rate for postoperative PJI outweighs the increased surgical complexity of the CORIHA procedure needs further evaluation.

无骨水泥一期翻修治疗早期假体周围髋关节感染-一个病例系列
摘要背景:早期假体周围髋关节感染(PJI)的传统治疗方法是清创、抗生素和假体保留(DAIR)。然而,dair治疗假体周围髋关节感染后的感染控制率不超过77 %。通过感染髋关节置换术(CORIHA)方案的无骨水泥一期翻修慢性PJI已获得积极评价,成功率为91% %。我们想评估在择期一期全髋关节置换术中,按照CORIHA方案对早期PJI进行无骨水泥一期翻修的有效性,并考虑再手术与植入物交换的风险。方法:2012年1月至2018年3月,本中心18例经一期无骨水泥翻修的原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)术后早期(术后≤6周)PJI患者。治疗遵循CORIHA方案。在最近的随访中,主要结果是种植体的保留。患者随访时间至少为3年。结果:平均随访时间60个月(39 ~ 105)。所有患者都保留了植入物,但有两名患者由于伤口持续渗液而需要进行浅表软组织清创。结论:无骨水泥一期翻修似乎是原发性THA后早期PJI的有效治疗方法,与DAIR相比,至少是一种平等的治疗选择。降低术后PJI再翻修率的潜在益处是否超过了CORIHA手术增加的手术复杂性,还需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信