The Conflict between Adonijah and Solomon in Light of Succession Practices Near and Far

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
A. Knapp
{"title":"The Conflict between Adonijah and Solomon in Light of Succession Practices Near and Far","authors":"A. Knapp","doi":"10.5508/JHS29557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The protocols for succession to the throne in ancient Israel and Judah have attracted little scholarly attention. In this article I first survey monarchic societies throughout history to show that there are no universally valid succession principles, despite scholars often treating primogeniture as such. I then look at evidence from ancient Near Eastern societies and suggest that in a “standard” scenario the incumbent king was expected to select a successor from a pool of viable candidates. I conclude by rereading Solomon’s accession to David’s throne in 1 Kings 1-2 in light of this.","PeriodicalId":40485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5508/JHS29557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The protocols for succession to the throne in ancient Israel and Judah have attracted little scholarly attention. In this article I first survey monarchic societies throughout history to show that there are no universally valid succession principles, despite scholars often treating primogeniture as such. I then look at evidence from ancient Near Eastern societies and suggest that in a “standard” scenario the incumbent king was expected to select a successor from a pool of viable candidates. I conclude by rereading Solomon’s accession to David’s throne in 1 Kings 1-2 in light of this.
从远近继承惯例看亚多尼雅与所罗门的冲突
古代以色列和犹大的王位继承协议很少引起学术界的关注。在这篇文章中,我首先调查了整个历史上的君主社会,以表明没有普遍有效的继承原则,尽管学者们经常这样对待长子继承制。然后,我查看了古代近东社会的证据,并提出在“标准”的情况下,现任国王应该从一批可行的候选人中选择一位继任者。最后,我根据这一点重读所罗门在列王记第1章至第2章登上大卫的王位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信