Does Teacher Education Matter? Comparison of Education and Science Major Teachers’ Assessment Literacy

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Demirdogen, Hatice Korkut
{"title":"Does Teacher Education Matter? Comparison of Education and Science Major Teachers’ Assessment Literacy","authors":"B. Demirdogen, Hatice Korkut","doi":"10.14689/ENAD.26.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate science teachers' assessment literacy having different majors (education versus science) and compare those teachers' assessment literacy. A multiple-case study, one of the qualitative research designs, was utilized to fulfill the aim. Four science teachers, two from each major, who were teaching at public schools during the 2017-2018 semesters, participated in the study. Preinterviews, observations, post-interviews, and documents were used as data collection tools during the investigation. Content analysis was conducted using science teachers' assessment literacy model that exists in the literature. The findings of the study revealed that science teachers were similar and different from each other with respect to several dimensions of assessment literacy, which are views about learning, assessment purposes, assessment strategies, what to assess, and assessment interpretation. Recommendations for science education research and implications for science teacher education are provided.","PeriodicalId":46491,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/ENAD.26.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate science teachers' assessment literacy having different majors (education versus science) and compare those teachers' assessment literacy. A multiple-case study, one of the qualitative research designs, was utilized to fulfill the aim. Four science teachers, two from each major, who were teaching at public schools during the 2017-2018 semesters, participated in the study. Preinterviews, observations, post-interviews, and documents were used as data collection tools during the investigation. Content analysis was conducted using science teachers' assessment literacy model that exists in the literature. The findings of the study revealed that science teachers were similar and different from each other with respect to several dimensions of assessment literacy, which are views about learning, assessment purposes, assessment strategies, what to assess, and assessment interpretation. Recommendations for science education research and implications for science teacher education are provided.
教师教育重要吗?教育与科学专业教师评价素养比较
本研究的目的是调查不同专业(教育与科学)的科学教师的评估素养,并比较这些教师的评估素质。为了实现这一目标,采用了多个案例研究,这是定性研究设计之一。2017-2018学期在公立学校任教的四名科学教师,每个专业两名,参与了这项研究。在调查过程中,使用了访谈前、观察、访谈后和文件作为数据收集工具。内容分析采用文献中存在的科学教师评估素养模型进行。研究结果表明,科学教师在评估素养的几个维度上既相似又不同,这些维度是关于学习、评估目的、评估策略、评估内容和评估解释的观点。提出了科学教育研究的建议和对科学教师教育的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER) is a peer-reviewed, an international and interdiscilinary journal publishing original research articles and significant contributions on education and educational sciences . The journal is a valuable resource for teachers, counselors, supervisors, educational administrators, school principals, educational policy makers, curriculum planners, and educational researchers as they consider the structure of tomorrow''s educational system. EJER publishes research employing a variety of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research and approaches in all areas in the field of education and educational sciences. The goal of the journal is to increase understanding of learning and teaching in eraly childhood, primary, secondary, vocational and higher education in order to to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信