Introverted Spatial Narrative: Azimuths and Linearity

Y. Tkhagazitov, T. Z. Tolgurov, F. Uzdenova
{"title":"Introverted Spatial Narrative: Azimuths and Linearity","authors":"Y. Tkhagazitov, T. Z. Tolgurov, F. Uzdenova","doi":"10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-204-216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of topological models of L.N. Tolstoy. The goal is to recearch the narrative and suggestive functions of the writer’s individual spatial representations, as well as their role in creating the emotive-evaluative structure of the narrative. The material of the study was the works: “Childhood”, “Foray”, “Master and Worker”, “Resurrection”. In modern literary criticism, there are de facto no studies of the writer’s spatial reflection, which already ensures a high level of relevance of the material presented. The main research methods were comparative, structural and descriptive, hermeneutic and interpretive, historical and functional, as well as the method of semantic analysis. In modern literary criticism, there are no actually studies of the spatial reflection of the writer, which already ensures a high level of relevance of the material presented. As a result of referring to the texts of several, especially illustrative works of the prose writer, the authors of the article come to two important conclusions. Firstly, the texts of L. Tolstoy testify that the writer did not focus on the linear and distance characteristics of the described topoi, limiting himself to the degree of their completeness and detail, which made it possible to create a reliable picture of the emotional and psychological state of the characters (this was explained by the artist’s overwhelming interest in the inner world of the characters, to revealing their mental and moral and ethical dominants). The objects described in the writer’s works, although they give some idea of ​​the areas of the ongoing action, in most cases act as sets of isolated points and objects. In the first case, such references are presented as a space of stable emotional and evaluative states of the characters (“Compound”, “road”, “field”), in the second case, by means of a concentrated enumeration of them, the author creates paintings saturated with traditional everyday associations, again, in order to create an effect of emotional contrast. Secondly, the writer, in general, tended to describe limited locations, to depict the closest to the point of observation of the author and the hero. According to the authors, it’s explained, by the peculiarities of L. Tolstoy’s psychotype, which were formed in the deep childhood of the writer. The study revealed that in the formation of the topology of narrative episodes, the writer was primarily interested in the internal movement of the human soul and he could well experiment with the narrative space in order to “obscure”, dematerialize it in order to fully concentrate on the main object of his attention.","PeriodicalId":34231,"journal":{"name":"Aktual''nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktual''nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-204-216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of topological models of L.N. Tolstoy. The goal is to recearch the narrative and suggestive functions of the writer’s individual spatial representations, as well as their role in creating the emotive-evaluative structure of the narrative. The material of the study was the works: “Childhood”, “Foray”, “Master and Worker”, “Resurrection”. In modern literary criticism, there are de facto no studies of the writer’s spatial reflection, which already ensures a high level of relevance of the material presented. The main research methods were comparative, structural and descriptive, hermeneutic and interpretive, historical and functional, as well as the method of semantic analysis. In modern literary criticism, there are no actually studies of the spatial reflection of the writer, which already ensures a high level of relevance of the material presented. As a result of referring to the texts of several, especially illustrative works of the prose writer, the authors of the article come to two important conclusions. Firstly, the texts of L. Tolstoy testify that the writer did not focus on the linear and distance characteristics of the described topoi, limiting himself to the degree of their completeness and detail, which made it possible to create a reliable picture of the emotional and psychological state of the characters (this was explained by the artist’s overwhelming interest in the inner world of the characters, to revealing their mental and moral and ethical dominants). The objects described in the writer’s works, although they give some idea of ​​the areas of the ongoing action, in most cases act as sets of isolated points and objects. In the first case, such references are presented as a space of stable emotional and evaluative states of the characters (“Compound”, “road”, “field”), in the second case, by means of a concentrated enumeration of them, the author creates paintings saturated with traditional everyday associations, again, in order to create an effect of emotional contrast. Secondly, the writer, in general, tended to describe limited locations, to depict the closest to the point of observation of the author and the hero. According to the authors, it’s explained, by the peculiarities of L. Tolstoy’s psychotype, which were formed in the deep childhood of the writer. The study revealed that in the formation of the topology of narrative episodes, the writer was primarily interested in the internal movement of the human soul and he could well experiment with the narrative space in order to “obscure”, dematerialize it in order to fully concentrate on the main object of his attention.
内向的空间叙事:方位与线性
本文对托尔斯泰的拓扑模型进行了分析。目的是研究作者个人空间表现的叙事和暗示功能,以及它们在创造叙事的情感评价结构中的作用。研究材料为《童年》、《突袭》、《主人与工人》、《复活》等作品。在现代文学批评中,事实上没有对作家空间反思的研究,这已经确保了所呈现材料的高度相关性。主要研究方法有比较法、结构法和描述法、解释法和解释法、历史法和功能法以及语义分析法。在现代文学批评中,实际上并没有对作家的空间反思进行研究,这已经确保了所呈现材料的高度相关性。在查阅了这位散文作家的几部作品,尤其是说明性作品的文本后,本文的作者得出了两个重要结论。首先,L.托尔斯泰的文本证明,作者没有关注所描述的地形的线性和距离特征,而是将自己限制在其完整性和细节的程度上,这使得他有可能创造出一幅可靠的人物情感和心理状态的画面(这可以解释为艺术家对人物内心世界的压倒性兴趣,以揭示他们的精神和道德和伦理优势)。作家作品中所描述的对象,尽管它们提供了一些正在进行的行动的区域的概念,但在大多数情况下,它们只是作为一组孤立的点和对象。在第一种情况下,这些参考被呈现为一个稳定的情感和评价状态的空间(“复合”,“路”,“场”),在第二种情况下,作者通过对它们的集中列举,创作出充满传统日常联想的绘画,再次创造出情感对比的效果。其次,一般来说,作者倾向于描述有限的地点,描绘最接近作者和主人公的观察点。根据作者的说法,这是由L.托尔斯泰心理类型的特点来解释的,这些特点是在作家的童年深处形成的。研究表明,在叙事情节拓扑的形成过程中,作者主要关注的是人的灵魂的内在运动,他可以很好地对叙事空间进行实验,以“模糊”、去物质化叙事空间,从而将注意力完全集中在他关注的主要对象上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信