COVID-19 infection in an intensive care unit in Tunisia: Risk factors of mortality

Youssef Fatma Ben, Mlouki Imene, Jawed Oussama, Omri Nihel, Hassen Mohamed Fekih, El-Chemaly Souheil, SiK Ali Habiba Ben, Mhamdi Sana El
{"title":"COVID-19 infection in an intensive care unit in Tunisia: Risk factors of mortality","authors":"Youssef Fatma Ben, Mlouki Imene, Jawed Oussama, Omri Nihel, Hassen Mohamed Fekih, El-Chemaly Souheil, SiK Ali Habiba Ben, Mhamdi Sana El","doi":"10.17352/2455-5479.000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Identification of COVID-19 patients at high risk of mortality is crucial to improve patient management. Our study aimed to identify mortality risk factors at the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU), in Mahdia. Methods: We conducted a prospective study including patients admitted to the COVID-19 ICU at University Hospital Tahar Sfar Mahdia (September 2020 to February 2021). We used “The RAPID CORE CASE REPORT FORM” developed by the World Health Organization. Results: A total of 119 patients were included (60.5% male). The average age was 61.9 ± 12 years. During their stay, 51.8% of them had invasive ventilation, 31.3 % required vasopressors intake and 50.9% required a prone position.  The mortality rate was 47.1%. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and Health Care Associated Infections (HAI) were associated with a higher risk of mortality (64.9% vs 17.8%; p < 0.001 and 81.1% vs 18.2 %; p < 0.001 respectively). Mortality was higher among intubated patients (79.7% vs 14.5%; p < 0.001). The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHII) score were higher in deaths than in survivors ((15.02 ± 7.6 vs 10.63 ± 5.31; p = 0.02). Low oxygen saturation on admission was associated with a higher risk of mortality (91.1% ± 6.44 vs 86% ± 11.25; p = 0.004).  Binary logistic regression showed increased odds of mortality with health-acquired infection (OR, 7.96 [95% CI, 2.28 - 27.7], severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR, 4.04 [95% CI, 1.11 - 14.73]) and invasive ventilation (OR, 12.23 [95% CI, 3.31 – 45.2]). Conclusion: Interventions preventing the risk factors are needed to improve the prognosis of Covid-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":87221,"journal":{"name":"Archives of community medicine and public health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of community medicine and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identification of COVID-19 patients at high risk of mortality is crucial to improve patient management. Our study aimed to identify mortality risk factors at the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU), in Mahdia. Methods: We conducted a prospective study including patients admitted to the COVID-19 ICU at University Hospital Tahar Sfar Mahdia (September 2020 to February 2021). We used “The RAPID CORE CASE REPORT FORM” developed by the World Health Organization. Results: A total of 119 patients were included (60.5% male). The average age was 61.9 ± 12 years. During their stay, 51.8% of them had invasive ventilation, 31.3 % required vasopressors intake and 50.9% required a prone position.  The mortality rate was 47.1%. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and Health Care Associated Infections (HAI) were associated with a higher risk of mortality (64.9% vs 17.8%; p < 0.001 and 81.1% vs 18.2 %; p < 0.001 respectively). Mortality was higher among intubated patients (79.7% vs 14.5%; p < 0.001). The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHII) score were higher in deaths than in survivors ((15.02 ± 7.6 vs 10.63 ± 5.31; p = 0.02). Low oxygen saturation on admission was associated with a higher risk of mortality (91.1% ± 6.44 vs 86% ± 11.25; p = 0.004).  Binary logistic regression showed increased odds of mortality with health-acquired infection (OR, 7.96 [95% CI, 2.28 - 27.7], severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR, 4.04 [95% CI, 1.11 - 14.73]) and invasive ventilation (OR, 12.23 [95% CI, 3.31 – 45.2]). Conclusion: Interventions preventing the risk factors are needed to improve the prognosis of Covid-19 patients.
突尼斯重症监护室新冠肺炎感染:死亡风险因素
简介:识别新冠肺炎高死亡风险患者对于改善患者管理至关重要。我们的研究旨在确定马赫迪亚新冠肺炎重症监护室(ICU)的死亡率风险因素。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,包括Tahar Sfar Mahdia大学医院新冠肺炎重症监护室(2020年9月至2021年2月)收治的患者。我们使用了世界卫生组织开发的“RAPID核心病例报告表”。结果:共纳入119例患者(60.5%为男性)。平均年龄61.9±12岁。在住院期间,51.8%的患者进行了有创通气,31.3%的患者需要服用血管升压药,50.9%的患者需要俯卧。死亡率为47.1%。严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征和医疗保健相关感染(HAI)与较高的死亡率相关(64.9%vs17.8%;p< 0.001和81.1%对18.2%;p < 0.001)。插管患者的死亡率更高(79.7%vs 14.5%;p<0.001)。死亡患者的平均急性生理学和慢性健康评估II(APACHII)评分高于幸存者(15.02±7.6 vs 10.63±5.31;p=0.02)。入院时低氧饱和度与更高的死亡风险相关(91.1%±6.44 vs 86%±11.25;p=0.004)。二元逻辑回归显示因健康需求性感染(OR,7.96[95%CI,2.28-27.7])、严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(OR,4.04[95%CI;1.11-14.73])和有创通气(OR,12.23[95%CI:3.31–45.2])而死亡的几率增加。结论:需要预防危险因素的干预措施来改善新冠肺炎患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信