Collective health and social psychology of praxis: an interdisciplinary path for meta-formation in graduate studies

Ianni Regia Scarcelli, Mariana Fagundes de Almeida Rivera, Ana Carolina Martins de Souza Felippe Valentim, Nayara Portilho Lima, Aline Almeida Martins
{"title":"Collective health and social psychology of praxis: an interdisciplinary path for meta-formation in graduate studies","authors":"Ianni Regia Scarcelli, Mariana Fagundes de Almeida Rivera, Ana Carolina Martins de Souza Felippe Valentim, Nayara Portilho Lima, Aline Almeida Martins","doi":"10.1590/0103-1104202213513i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is based on the understanding of interdisciplinarity as a way to act against the fragmented visions present in the processes of knowledge production and socialization. The objective is to share reflections that problematize interdisciplinarity from the experience of graduate academic training in a research group whose members have diverse training and professional fields and focus on the relationships between public policy, health and human needs. The reflections were based on issues that emerged during the group’s systematic meetings, and the group was understood as a theoretical and methodological strategy, and was sustained by the dialogue between collective health as a field of knowledge and practice, and the social psychology of praxis, formulated by Enrique Pichon-Rivière. The articulating axis of this experience is training in its broadest sense, manifested on the principle of the inseparability of (i.e., learning-research-doing) and as self-training in a mutual process of reflective teaching-research-outreach action, of learning how to learn. In this sense, it is argued that it is a metatraining that can only take place from the perspective of knowledge dialogues and interdisciplinarity.","PeriodicalId":31225,"journal":{"name":"Saude em Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202213513i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is based on the understanding of interdisciplinarity as a way to act against the fragmented visions present in the processes of knowledge production and socialization. The objective is to share reflections that problematize interdisciplinarity from the experience of graduate academic training in a research group whose members have diverse training and professional fields and focus on the relationships between public policy, health and human needs. The reflections were based on issues that emerged during the group’s systematic meetings, and the group was understood as a theoretical and methodological strategy, and was sustained by the dialogue between collective health as a field of knowledge and practice, and the social psychology of praxis, formulated by Enrique Pichon-Rivière. The articulating axis of this experience is training in its broadest sense, manifested on the principle of the inseparability of (i.e., learning-research-doing) and as self-training in a mutual process of reflective teaching-research-outreach action, of learning how to learn. In this sense, it is argued that it is a metatraining that can only take place from the perspective of knowledge dialogues and interdisciplinarity.
集体健康与实践社会心理学:研究生学习元形成的跨学科路径
摘要本文基于对跨学科性的理解,将其作为一种对抗知识生产和社会化过程中存在的碎片化愿景的方式。目的是分享一个研究小组的研究生学术培训经验中的跨学科问题思考,该小组的成员拥有不同的培训和专业领域,并专注于公共政策、卫生和人类需求之间的关系。这些思考是基于该小组系统会议期间出现的问题,该小组被理解为一种理论和方法论战略,并通过作为知识和实践领域的集体健康与Enrique Pichon Rivière制定的实践社会心理学之间的对话而得到支持。这种经验的表达轴是最广泛意义上的训练,表现在不可分割的原则上(即学习研究),并作为反思性教学研究外展行动和学习如何学习的相互过程中的自我训练。从这个意义上说,它是一种元训练,只能从知识对话和跨学科的角度进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信