Examining Diabetes Distress in Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Holly Tschirhart, J. Yost, J. Landeen, K. Nerenberg, D. Sherifali
{"title":"Examining Diabetes Distress in Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Holly Tschirhart, J. Yost, J. Landeen, K. Nerenberg, D. Sherifali","doi":"10.1177/16094069221131192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes distress has been shown to be highly prevalent in adults living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with important implications for glycemic control, self-care, and self-management behaviors. Despite considerable focus on self-management and glycemic targets during pregnancy, current literature lacks information on diabetes distress in pregnancy, particularly in women with type 2 diabetes. This article outlines an explanatory sequential mixed methods research protocol to examine diabetes distress during pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes. The aims of the study were to: (1) establish the prevalence and correlates of diabetes distress in women attending a diabetes and pregnancy clinic; (2) use this quantitative data to inform development of an interview guide and plan for sampling for telephone interviews; and (3) explore and describe the experiences of diabetes distress during pregnancy. The quantitative strand was a cross-sectional survey of 76 women using self-reported questionnaires to collect demographic and clinical data, and validated tools to assess health variables, including the outcome of interest of diabetes distress using the Problem Area in Diabetes scale. The qualitative strand applied interpretive description methodology to explore the quantitative results using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 18 women to obtain patient perspectives of diabetes distress and experiences of managing diabetes in pregnancy. The explanatory sequential mixed methods research will provide an opportunity to add contextual qualitative experiences from women with pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy to provide a comprehensive picture of diabetes distress. The results will inform further research priorities that protect and promote mental health, psychosocial well-being, and self-management practices for this population.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221131192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes distress has been shown to be highly prevalent in adults living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with important implications for glycemic control, self-care, and self-management behaviors. Despite considerable focus on self-management and glycemic targets during pregnancy, current literature lacks information on diabetes distress in pregnancy, particularly in women with type 2 diabetes. This article outlines an explanatory sequential mixed methods research protocol to examine diabetes distress during pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes. The aims of the study were to: (1) establish the prevalence and correlates of diabetes distress in women attending a diabetes and pregnancy clinic; (2) use this quantitative data to inform development of an interview guide and plan for sampling for telephone interviews; and (3) explore and describe the experiences of diabetes distress during pregnancy. The quantitative strand was a cross-sectional survey of 76 women using self-reported questionnaires to collect demographic and clinical data, and validated tools to assess health variables, including the outcome of interest of diabetes distress using the Problem Area in Diabetes scale. The qualitative strand applied interpretive description methodology to explore the quantitative results using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 18 women to obtain patient perspectives of diabetes distress and experiences of managing diabetes in pregnancy. The explanatory sequential mixed methods research will provide an opportunity to add contextual qualitative experiences from women with pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy to provide a comprehensive picture of diabetes distress. The results will inform further research priorities that protect and promote mental health, psychosocial well-being, and self-management practices for this population.
妊娠期既往糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦的检测:解释性序贯混合方法研究方案
糖尿病困扰已被证明在患有1型和2型糖尿病的成年人中非常普遍,对血糖控制、自我护理和自我管理行为具有重要意义。尽管相当关注妊娠期间的自我管理和血糖目标,但目前的文献缺乏关于妊娠期糖尿病困扰的信息,尤其是在患有2型糖尿病的女性中。本文概述了一个解释性的顺序混合方法研究方案,以检查已有糖尿病的女性在怀孕期间的糖尿病困扰。该研究的目的是:(1)确定参加糖尿病和妊娠诊所的女性糖尿病痛苦的患病率和相关性;(2) 使用这些定量数据来制定面试指南和电话面试抽样计划;(3)探讨和描述妊娠期糖尿病痛苦的经历。定量链是一项针对76名女性的横断面调查,使用自我报告问卷收集人口统计和临床数据,并使用经验证的工具评估健康变量,包括使用糖尿病问题领域量表对糖尿病困扰感兴趣的结果。定性研究采用解释性描述方法,对18名女性进行半结构化定性访谈,以获得患者对糖尿病困扰的看法和妊娠期糖尿病管理经验,从而探索定量结果。解释性顺序混合方法研究将提供一个机会,添加妊娠期已有糖尿病的女性的上下文定性经验,以全面了解糖尿病困扰。研究结果将为进一步的研究重点提供信息,以保护和促进这一人群的心理健康、心理健康和自我管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信