Using Machine Learning to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome From Electronic Health Records.

Psychiatric research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2023-03-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1176/appi.prcp.20220015
Zhenxing Xu, Veer Vekaria, Fei Wang, Judith Cukor, Chang Su, Prakash Adekkanattu, Pascal Brandt, Guoqian Jiang, Richard C Kiefer, Yuan Luo, Luke V Rasmussen, Jie Xu, Yunyu Xiao, George Alexopoulos, Jyotishman Pathak
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome From Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Zhenxing Xu, Veer Vekaria, Fei Wang, Judith Cukor, Chang Su, Prakash Adekkanattu, Pascal Brandt, Guoqian Jiang, Richard C Kiefer, Yuan Luo, Luke V Rasmussen, Jie Xu, Yunyu Xiao, George Alexopoulos, Jyotishman Pathak","doi":"10.1176/appi.prcp.20220015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if a machine learning approach can accurately predict antidepressant treatment outcome using electronic health records (EHRs) from patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined 808 patients with depression at a New York City-based outpatient mental health clinic between June 13, 2016 and June 22, 2020. Antidepressant treatment outcome was defined based on trend in depression symptom severity over time and was categorized as either \"Recovering\" or \"Worsening\" (i.e., non-Recovering), measured by the slope of individual-level Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score trajectory spanning 6 months following treatment initiation. A patient was designated as \"Recovering\" if the slope is less than 0 and as \"Worsening\" if the slope was no less than 0. Multiple machine learning (ML) models including L2 norm regularized Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) were used to predict treatment outcome based on additional data from EHRs, including demographics and diagnoses. Shapley Additive Explanations were applied to identify the most important predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GBDT achieved the best results of predicting \"Recovering\" (AUC: 0.7654 ± 0.0227; precision: 0.6002 ± 0.0215; recall: 0.5131 ± 0.0336). When excluding patients with low PHQ-9 scores (<10) at baseline, the results of predicting \"Recovering\" (AUC: 0.7254 ± 0.0218; precision: 0.5392 ± 0.0437; recall: 0.4431 ± 0.0513) were obtained. Prior diagnosis of anxiety, psychotherapy, recurrent depression, and baseline depression symptom severity were strong predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate the potential utility of using ML in longitudinal EHRs to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Our predictive tool holds the promise to accelerate personalized medical management in patients with psychiatric illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":74592,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20220015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if a machine learning approach can accurately predict antidepressant treatment outcome using electronic health records (EHRs) from patients with depression.

Method: This study examined 808 patients with depression at a New York City-based outpatient mental health clinic between June 13, 2016 and June 22, 2020. Antidepressant treatment outcome was defined based on trend in depression symptom severity over time and was categorized as either "Recovering" or "Worsening" (i.e., non-Recovering), measured by the slope of individual-level Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score trajectory spanning 6 months following treatment initiation. A patient was designated as "Recovering" if the slope is less than 0 and as "Worsening" if the slope was no less than 0. Multiple machine learning (ML) models including L2 norm regularized Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) were used to predict treatment outcome based on additional data from EHRs, including demographics and diagnoses. Shapley Additive Explanations were applied to identify the most important predictors.

Results: The GBDT achieved the best results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7654 ± 0.0227; precision: 0.6002 ± 0.0215; recall: 0.5131 ± 0.0336). When excluding patients with low PHQ-9 scores (<10) at baseline, the results of predicting "Recovering" (AUC: 0.7254 ± 0.0218; precision: 0.5392 ± 0.0437; recall: 0.4431 ± 0.0513) were obtained. Prior diagnosis of anxiety, psychotherapy, recurrent depression, and baseline depression symptom severity were strong predictors.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the potential utility of using ML in longitudinal EHRs to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Our predictive tool holds the promise to accelerate personalized medical management in patients with psychiatric illnesses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用机器学习从电子健康记录中预测抗抑郁治疗结果
目的评估机器学习方法能否利用抑郁症患者的电子健康记录(EHR)准确预测抗抑郁治疗结果:本研究调查了 2016 年 6 月 13 日至 2020 年 6 月 22 日期间纽约市一家心理健康门诊的 808 名抑郁症患者。抗抑郁治疗结果是根据抑郁症状严重程度随时间变化的趋势来定义的,可分为 "康复 "或 "恶化"(即非康复),以治疗开始后 6 个月内个人水平的患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)得分轨迹斜率来衡量。多种机器学习(ML)模型包括 L2 规范正则化 Logistic 回归、Naive Bayes、随机森林和梯度提升决策树(GBDT),用于根据电子病历(EHR)中的其他数据(包括人口统计学和诊断)预测治疗结果。结果显示,GBDT 取得了最佳结果:GBDT在预测 "康复 "方面取得了最佳结果(AUC:0.7654 ± 0.0227;精确度:0.6002 ± 0.0215;召回率:0.5131 ± 0.0336)。当排除 PHQ-9 评分较低的患者时(结论:PHQ-9 评分较低的患者可能会被排除在外:结果表明,在纵向电子病历中使用 ML 预测抗抑郁治疗结果具有潜在的实用性。我们的预测工具有望加速精神病患者的个性化医疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书