Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Informal Logic Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.22329/il.v42i1.7222

Chrysi Rapanta

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Douglas Walton, perhaps the most prolific author in Argumentation theory, has been of a great influence in the fields of Informal logic, Artificial intelligence, and Law. His contributions in the field of educational research, in particular in the field of argumentation and education, are less known. This review paper aims at shedding light on those aspects of Walton’s theory that have received educational researchers’ attention thus far, as well identifying existing lacks of consideration and open paths for future research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

道格拉斯·沃尔顿对教育的贡献

道格拉斯·沃尔顿(Douglas Walton)可能是论证理论领域最多产的作者，他在非正式逻辑、人工智能和法律领域都有很大的影响。他在教育研究领域的贡献，特别是在论证和教育领域，鲜为人知。这篇综述文章旨在揭示沃尔顿理论中迄今为止受到教育研究者关注的那些方面，并指出目前缺乏考虑和未来研究的开放路径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.