Manufactured housing parks: could their residents be buyers of the property?

IF 1.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
D. Bunce
{"title":"Manufactured housing parks: could their residents be buyers of the property?","authors":"D. Bunce","doi":"10.1108/pm-11-2021-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this article is to explore the possibility of people living in manufactured housing parks in Australia to collectively buy the property at fair market value and convert it into a resident owned community co-operative.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological approach is based on 20 interviews with occupants of resident owned communities (ROCs) and key informants in the USA state of New Hampshire. Residents' interviews provide an understanding of the motivations to want to own and self-manage the property.FindingsThe findings suggest that, based on USA experience and the availability of enabling financial structures, Australian residential park residents could be keen buyers of manufactured housing park properties.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of this research was the small number of interviewees who were mainly people in ROC leadership positions and advocates. Another limitation was that no specific investigation was made to gauge manufactured housing park (MHP) residents' level of demand for ROCs in Australia. Although there was some evidence of support, further Australia-wide enquiry is needed.Practical implicationsThe sale of MHPs to resident co-operatives could become a new component of the property market in Australia and residents entering the market as buyers may cause a shift in market forces.Social implicationsROCs would offer greater diversity of housing choice and might further inform decision-makers of seniors and retirees' future intentions. Downsizers moving to ROCs could potentially increase the savings nest egg through the sale of the family home which will also free-up conventional housing for better utilisation by younger cohorts.Originality/valueOwners of residential parks are unlikely to have considered the tenants as potential buyers of the property, but, envisaging, ROCs could become a new type of tenure for Australians aged over 50 years.","PeriodicalId":46102,"journal":{"name":"Property Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Property Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-11-2021-0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to explore the possibility of people living in manufactured housing parks in Australia to collectively buy the property at fair market value and convert it into a resident owned community co-operative.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological approach is based on 20 interviews with occupants of resident owned communities (ROCs) and key informants in the USA state of New Hampshire. Residents' interviews provide an understanding of the motivations to want to own and self-manage the property.FindingsThe findings suggest that, based on USA experience and the availability of enabling financial structures, Australian residential park residents could be keen buyers of manufactured housing park properties.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of this research was the small number of interviewees who were mainly people in ROC leadership positions and advocates. Another limitation was that no specific investigation was made to gauge manufactured housing park (MHP) residents' level of demand for ROCs in Australia. Although there was some evidence of support, further Australia-wide enquiry is needed.Practical implicationsThe sale of MHPs to resident co-operatives could become a new component of the property market in Australia and residents entering the market as buyers may cause a shift in market forces.Social implicationsROCs would offer greater diversity of housing choice and might further inform decision-makers of seniors and retirees' future intentions. Downsizers moving to ROCs could potentially increase the savings nest egg through the sale of the family home which will also free-up conventional housing for better utilisation by younger cohorts.Originality/valueOwners of residential parks are unlikely to have considered the tenants as potential buyers of the property, but, envisaging, ROCs could become a new type of tenure for Australians aged over 50 years.
人造住宅园区:其居民会成为房产的买家吗?
目的本文的目的是探索居住在澳大利亚人造住宅园区的人们以公平市场价值集体购买房产并将其转化为居民所有的社区合作社的可能性。设计/方法/方法该方法基于对居民所有社区(ROC)居住者和美国新罕布什尔州。居民的采访让他们了解了想要拥有和自我管理房产的动机。调查结果表明,根据美国的经验和扶持性金融结构的可用性,澳大利亚住宅园区居民可能是人造住宅园区房产的热衷买家。研究局限性/含义本研究的局限性在于受访者人数较少,主要是担任中华民国领导职务的人和倡导者。另一个限制是,没有进行具体调查来衡量澳大利亚制造住房园区(MHP)居民对ROC的需求水平。尽管有一些支持的证据,但还需要在全澳大利亚范围内进行进一步调查。实际含义向居民合作社出售MHP可能成为澳大利亚房地产市场的一个新组成部分,居民作为买家进入市场可能会导致市场力量的转变。社会影响ROC将提供更大的住房选择多样性,并可能进一步告知决策者老年人和退休人员的未来意图。搬到ROC的购房者可能会通过出售家庭住宅来增加储蓄,这也将腾出传统住房,让年轻人更好地利用。创意/价值住宅公园的所有者不太可能将租户视为该房产的潜在买家,但从设想来看,ROC可能会成为50岁以上澳大利亚人的一种新型保有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Property Management
Property Management MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Property Management publishes: ■Refereed papers on important current trends and reserach issues ■Digests of market reports and data ■In-depth analysis of a specific area ■Legal updates on judgments in landlord and tenant law ■Regular book and internet reviews providing an overview of the growing body of property market research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信