“Defund the police:” Perceptions among protesters in the 2020 March on Washington

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jennifer Cobbina-Dungy, Soma Chaudhuri, Ashleigh LaCourse, Christina DeJong
{"title":"“Defund the police:” Perceptions among protesters in the 2020 March on Washington","authors":"Jennifer Cobbina-Dungy,&nbsp;Soma Chaudhuri,&nbsp;Ashleigh LaCourse,&nbsp;Christina DeJong","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Research summary</b>: Using qualitative interviews, this study examines how protesters with varying levels of commitment to the Black Lives Matter movement perceive the slogan defund the police. Findings indicate while a small number had reservations regarding the term, the vast majority of protesters associate defunding as a two-step process that starts with reduction of police budgets, followed by reallocation of these resources toward much needed services in the very communities the departments serve. Findings also revealed prior engagement with the Black Lives Matter movement, and the level of commitment of participants did play an important role in being able to provide nuanced context to the call for action.</p><p><b>Policy implications</b>: Implementation of reduction of police budgets indicates a need to reimagine the role and function of police in most affected communities. In addition, there is a need to reinvest in local resources that would provide the much needed support toward marginalized communities. Further, social movement organizations should partner with corporate brands and advertising agencies to effectively promote their goals and slogans toward a diverse range of audience in media.</p>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":"147-174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Research summary: Using qualitative interviews, this study examines how protesters with varying levels of commitment to the Black Lives Matter movement perceive the slogan defund the police. Findings indicate while a small number had reservations regarding the term, the vast majority of protesters associate defunding as a two-step process that starts with reduction of police budgets, followed by reallocation of these resources toward much needed services in the very communities the departments serve. Findings also revealed prior engagement with the Black Lives Matter movement, and the level of commitment of participants did play an important role in being able to provide nuanced context to the call for action.

Policy implications: Implementation of reduction of police budgets indicates a need to reimagine the role and function of police in most affected communities. In addition, there is a need to reinvest in local resources that would provide the much needed support toward marginalized communities. Further, social movement organizations should partner with corporate brands and advertising agencies to effectively promote their goals and slogans toward a diverse range of audience in media.

“解散警察”:2020年华盛顿大游行中抗议者的看法
研究总结:使用定性访谈,本研究考察了对“黑人的命也是命”运动有不同程度承诺的抗议者如何看待口号“解散警察”。调查结果表明,虽然少数人对这一术语持保留态度,但绝大多数抗议者认为,削减资金是一个分两步进行的过程,首先是减少警察预算,然后将这些资源重新分配给警察部门所服务的社区急需的服务。调查结果还显示,之前参与了“黑人的命也是命”运动,参与者的承诺水平确实在能够为行动呼吁提供微妙的背景方面发挥了重要作用。政策影响:削减警察预算的实施表明,需要重新设想警察在最受影响社区中的作用和职能。此外,有必要对地方资源进行再投资,为边缘化社区提供急需的支持。此外,社会运动组织应该与企业品牌和广告公司合作,在媒体上向不同的受众有效地宣传他们的目标和口号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信