Hester Pulter's Well-Wrought Urns: Early Modern Women, Sonnets, and New Criticism

IF 0.1 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Elizabeth Scott-Baumann
{"title":"Hester Pulter's Well-Wrought Urns: Early Modern Women, Sonnets, and New Criticism","authors":"Elizabeth Scott-Baumann","doi":"10.1353/JEM.2020.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Accounts of Hester Pulter's life often open with John Milton's poem to her sister, Margaret Ley. Yet the form in which he wrote—a sonnet—was not one Pulter chose to write in, and indeed relatively few seventeenth-century women did so. In her essay \"Where had all the flowers gone?: The Missing Space of Female Sonneteers in Seventeenth-Century England,\" Diana Henderson suggests that we read as sonnets many poems by women that have some sonnet qualities. Pulter's short poems, including \"The Circle [2],\" \"Immense Fount of Truth,\" and \"The Hope,\" draw the reader into a dizzying landscape of circles, revolutions, centers, stairs, and urns. These material forms represent Pulter's deep and rebarbative interaction with the sonnet tradition. Reading Pulter's poems in this way challenges versions of literary history that suggest women did not write sonnets for a century after Mary Wroth. This essay will suggest that seeing Pulter's poems as critical sonnets also allows us to place her work in dialogue with the New Critics. While Cleanth Brooks, of course, never read Hester Pulter, her metaphors of form provide a proleptic criticism of the New Critics' own use of formal metaphors to write literary history.","PeriodicalId":42614,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"120 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JEM.2020.0012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JEM.2020.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Accounts of Hester Pulter's life often open with John Milton's poem to her sister, Margaret Ley. Yet the form in which he wrote—a sonnet—was not one Pulter chose to write in, and indeed relatively few seventeenth-century women did so. In her essay "Where had all the flowers gone?: The Missing Space of Female Sonneteers in Seventeenth-Century England," Diana Henderson suggests that we read as sonnets many poems by women that have some sonnet qualities. Pulter's short poems, including "The Circle [2]," "Immense Fount of Truth," and "The Hope," draw the reader into a dizzying landscape of circles, revolutions, centers, stairs, and urns. These material forms represent Pulter's deep and rebarbative interaction with the sonnet tradition. Reading Pulter's poems in this way challenges versions of literary history that suggest women did not write sonnets for a century after Mary Wroth. This essay will suggest that seeing Pulter's poems as critical sonnets also allows us to place her work in dialogue with the New Critics. While Cleanth Brooks, of course, never read Hester Pulter, her metaphors of form provide a proleptic criticism of the New Critics' own use of formal metaphors to write literary history.
海丝特·普尔特精心制作的骨灰瓮:早期现代女性、十四行诗与新批评
关于海丝特·普尔特的生平,人们常常以约翰·弥尔顿写给她妹妹玛格丽特·莱伊的那首诗开头。然而,他写作的形式——十四行诗——并不是普尔特所选择的,事实上,相对较少的17世纪女性会这样做。在她的文章《花儿都到哪里去了?》: 17世纪英国女性十四行诗的缺失空间,“戴安娜·亨德森建议我们把许多具有十四行诗特质的女性诗歌作为十四行诗来读。普尔特的短诗,包括“圆b[2]”,“真理的巨大源泉”和“希望”,将读者带入一个令人眼花缭乱的圆圈,革命,中心,楼梯和瓮的景观。这些物质形式代表了普尔特与十四行诗传统的深刻而令人厌恶的互动。以这种方式阅读普尔特的诗歌挑战了文学史上的一些版本,这些版本认为女性在玛丽·沃斯之后的一个世纪里都没有写十四行诗。这篇文章将表明,将普尔特的诗歌视为批评十四行诗,也使我们能够将她的作品与新批评派进行对话。当然,克林斯·布鲁克斯从未读过海丝特·普尔特的作品,但她对形式的隐喻对新批评派在书写文学史时使用形式隐喻的做法进行了预见性的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信