{"title":"A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield","authors":"Mauricio Tejera-Nieves, Berkley J. Walker","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A long-standing question in perennial grass breeding and physiology is whether yield improvement strategies could compromise winter survival. Since perennial grasses rely on stored carbohydrates for winter maintenance and spring regrowth, yield improvement strategies could reduce winter survival if they increase biomass and grain yields at the expense of carbon allocation to storage. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the dependence of regrowth on storage reserves. We experimentally depleted switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.) rhizome reserves by storing rhizomes for 2 weeks at 5°C (control treatment) and 25°C (reserve-depleted treatment). During the storage period rhizome respiration was 5.3× higher at 25°C (0.010 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> g<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 5°C vs. 0.054 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> g<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> at 25°C; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and the starch content was depleted by 30% by the end of storage. Surprisingly, reserve-depleted switchgrass had 60% larger leaf area (LA; LA<sub>control</sub> = 149 cm<sup>2</sup> pot<sup>−1</sup> vs. LA<sub>depleted</sub> = 239 cm<sup>2</sup> pot<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.013) and produced ~40% more aboveground biomass than control plants (9.46 g pot<sup>−1</sup> vs. 6.63 g pot<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.112). In addition, reserve-depleted switchgrass restored its rhizome starch reserves to pre-storage levels. Switchgrass showed a large plasticity among its source-sink components to buffer the imposed reserve depletion. It increased plant photosynthesis by increasing the photosynthetic leaf area while keeping photosynthesis constant on a leaf area basis and readjusted the timing and activity of sink organs. These results suggest that switchgrass, and potentially other perennial grasses, largely over-invest in storage reserves. Therefore, current breeding strategies in perennial grasses aimed to extend the aboveground growing season should not compromise crop persistence. Our study also has implications on long-term yield dynamics as it highlights sink limitations as potential driver of the yield decline commonly observed in perennial grasses 5+ years after cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"15 11","pages":"1329-1338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A long-standing question in perennial grass breeding and physiology is whether yield improvement strategies could compromise winter survival. Since perennial grasses rely on stored carbohydrates for winter maintenance and spring regrowth, yield improvement strategies could reduce winter survival if they increase biomass and grain yields at the expense of carbon allocation to storage. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the dependence of regrowth on storage reserves. We experimentally depleted switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) rhizome reserves by storing rhizomes for 2 weeks at 5°C (control treatment) and 25°C (reserve-depleted treatment). During the storage period rhizome respiration was 5.3× higher at 25°C (0.010 μmol CO2 g−1 min−1 at 5°C vs. 0.054 μmol CO2 g−1 min−1 at 25°C; p < 0.0001) and the starch content was depleted by 30% by the end of storage. Surprisingly, reserve-depleted switchgrass had 60% larger leaf area (LA; LAcontrol = 149 cm2 pot−1 vs. LAdepleted = 239 cm2 pot−1; p = 0.013) and produced ~40% more aboveground biomass than control plants (9.46 g pot−1 vs. 6.63 g pot−1; p = 0.112). In addition, reserve-depleted switchgrass restored its rhizome starch reserves to pre-storage levels. Switchgrass showed a large plasticity among its source-sink components to buffer the imposed reserve depletion. It increased plant photosynthesis by increasing the photosynthetic leaf area while keeping photosynthesis constant on a leaf area basis and readjusted the timing and activity of sink organs. These results suggest that switchgrass, and potentially other perennial grasses, largely over-invest in storage reserves. Therefore, current breeding strategies in perennial grasses aimed to extend the aboveground growing season should not compromise crop persistence. Our study also has implications on long-term yield dynamics as it highlights sink limitations as potential driver of the yield decline commonly observed in perennial grasses 5+ years after cultivation.
多年生草育种和生理学中一个长期存在的问题是产量提高策略是否会损害冬季存活率。由于多年生禾草依赖储存的碳水化合物进行冬季维持和春季再生,如果产量提高策略以牺牲碳储存分配为代价来增加生物量和粮食产量,则可能降低冬季存活率。因此,了解再生对储存储量的依赖是至关重要的。我们通过在5°C(对照处理)和25°C(储备耗尽处理)下将柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)根茎储存2周的实验,耗尽了其根茎的储备。贮藏期间,25℃条件下根茎呼吸量增加5.3倍(5℃条件下为0.010 μmol CO2 g−1 min−1,25℃条件下为0.054 μmol CO2 g−1 min−1;P < 0.0001),贮藏结束时淀粉含量减少30%。令人惊讶的是,储备枯竭的柳枝稷的叶面积增加了60% (LA;laccontrol = 149 cm2 pot - 1 vs la贫化= 239 cm2 pot - 1;P = 0.013),产生的地上生物量比对照植株多40% (9.46 g pot - 1比6.63 g pot - 1;p = 0.112)。此外,储备耗尽的柳枝稷将其根茎淀粉储备恢复到储存前的水平。柳枝稷的源汇成分具有很大的可塑性,可以缓冲被施加的储备枯竭。它在保持叶片面积不变的基础上,通过增加光合叶面积来增加植物的光合作用,并重新调节汇器官的时间和活性。这些结果表明,柳枝稷和潜在的其他多年生禾草在很大程度上过度投资于储存储备。因此,当前多年生牧草的育种策略应以延长地上生长季节为目标,而不应损害作物的持久性。我们的研究还对长期产量动态具有启示意义,因为它强调了在多年生牧草种植5年以上后普遍观察到的产量下降的潜在驱动因素是汇限制。
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.