Using Values-Based Focus Groups to Evaluate Visitors’ Perceptions and Interpretation of a Wildlife Exhibit

IF 1.6 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
J. Sneddon, K. Hughes, R. Ballantyne
{"title":"Using Values-Based Focus Groups to Evaluate Visitors’ Perceptions and Interpretation of a Wildlife Exhibit","authors":"J. Sneddon, K. Hughes, R. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1080/10645578.2020.1852809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Zoos and aquariums consider themselves agents of environmental change, yet systematic efforts to evaluate how diverse audiences perceive individual exhibits and interpretive messages are rare. In response to a growing interest in understanding how visitors’ values (i.e. broad motivational life goals) influence their experiences and learning outcomes, this article examines whether visitors’ evaluations of a zoo exhibit reflect their value priorities. In an exploratory study of exhibit evaluation, 23 visitors were allocated to focus groups according to whether they prioritized self-transcendence, openness to change, or conservation values. Participants were then asked to identify elements of a target wildlife exhibit that would or would not motivate them to adopt conservation actions. While there were some commonalities, each values based focus group reacted to the target exhibit and interpretation differently and in ways that reflected the content of their shared value priorities. Suggestions for how this novel values-based approach to exhibit evaluation can be used to create messages and experiences that tap visitors’ value priorities are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45516,"journal":{"name":"Visitor Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"100 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10645578.2020.1852809","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visitor Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2020.1852809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Zoos and aquariums consider themselves agents of environmental change, yet systematic efforts to evaluate how diverse audiences perceive individual exhibits and interpretive messages are rare. In response to a growing interest in understanding how visitors’ values (i.e. broad motivational life goals) influence their experiences and learning outcomes, this article examines whether visitors’ evaluations of a zoo exhibit reflect their value priorities. In an exploratory study of exhibit evaluation, 23 visitors were allocated to focus groups according to whether they prioritized self-transcendence, openness to change, or conservation values. Participants were then asked to identify elements of a target wildlife exhibit that would or would not motivate them to adopt conservation actions. While there were some commonalities, each values based focus group reacted to the target exhibit and interpretation differently and in ways that reflected the content of their shared value priorities. Suggestions for how this novel values-based approach to exhibit evaluation can be used to create messages and experiences that tap visitors’ value priorities are discussed.
使用基于价值观的焦点小组来评估游客对野生动物展览的看法和解释
动物园和水族馆认为自己是环境变化的推动者,然而系统地评估不同观众如何看待单个展品和解释性信息的努力很少。为了回应对了解游客的价值观(即广泛的激励人生目标)如何影响他们的经历和学习成果的日益增长的兴趣,本文研究了游客对动物园展览的评价是否反映了他们的价值优先级。在一项展览评价的探索性研究中,23名参观者被分配到焦点小组,根据他们是否优先考虑自我超越、开放变化或保护价值。然后,参与者被要求确定目标野生动物展览的元素,这些元素会或不会激励他们采取保护行动。虽然有一些共同点,但每个基于价值观的焦点小组对目标展览和解释的反应不同,并以反映其共同价值优先事项内容的方式。讨论了如何使用这种新颖的基于价值的展览评估方法来创造信息和体验,以挖掘游客的价值优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visitor Studies
Visitor Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信