Social Evaluation at a Distance – Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education

IF 2 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.5334/irsp.686

Nathalie Bick, L. Froehlich, Maria‐Therese Friehs, P. Kotzur, Helen Landmann

{"title":"Social Evaluation at a Distance – Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education","authors":"Nathalie Bick, L. Froehlich, Maria‐Therese Friehs, P. Kotzur, Helen Landmann","doi":"10.5334/irsp.686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the academic domain, belonging to a negatively stereotyped group can impair performance and peer relationships. In higher distance education, stereotypes may be particularly influential as face-to-face contact is limited and non-traditional students who are at risk of being stereotyped are overrepresented. Still, research on stereotypes in higher distance education is sparse. The current research addresses this gap by investigating the Big Two of social perception (warmth, competence) and subordinate facets (friendliness, morality, assertiveness, ability, conscientiousness) in the context of higher distance education. It tests a) how well models with warmth/competence or the facets fit the data, b) whether stereotypes in higher distance education depend on the student group, and c) how the Big Two and subordinate facets predict intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions in higher distance education. An online survey with N = 626 students (74% female) of a large distance university showed that a measurement model with four facets (i.e., friendliness, morality, ability, conscientiousness) reveals adequate model fit for 12 student groups. Perceived stereotypes were positive for female","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the academic domain, belonging to a negatively stereotyped group can impair performance and peer relationships. In higher distance education, stereotypes may be particularly influential as face-to-face contact is limited and non-traditional students who are at risk of being stereotyped are overrepresented. Still, research on stereotypes in higher distance education is sparse. The current research addresses this gap by investigating the Big Two of social perception (warmth, competence) and subordinate facets (friendliness, morality, assertiveness, ability, conscientiousness) in the context of higher distance education. It tests a) how well models with warmth/competence or the facets fit the data, b) whether stereotypes in higher distance education depend on the student group, and c) how the Big Two and subordinate facets predict intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions in higher distance education. An online survey with N = 626 students (74% female) of a large distance university showed that a measurement model with four facets (i.e., friendliness, morality, ability, conscientiousness) reveals adequate model fit for 12 student groups. Perceived stereotypes were positive for female

查看原文本刊更多论文

远距离社会评价——高等远程教育学生群体刻板印象内容的面向

在学术领域，属于一个负面刻板印象的群体会损害表现和同伴关系。在高等远程教育中，刻板印象可能特别有影响，因为面对面的接触有限，而且有被刻板印象风险的非传统学生比例过高。尽管如此，对高等远程教育中的陈规定型观念的研究还是很少。目前的研究通过调查高等远程教育背景下的社会感知（热情、能力）和从属方面（友好、道德、自信、能力、责任感）这两大方面来解决这一差距。它测试了a）具有温暖/能力或方面的模型与数据的拟合程度，b）高等远程教育中的刻板印象是否取决于学生群体，以及c）大二和从属方面如何预测高等远程教育的群体间情绪和行为意图。一项针对一所大型远程大学626名学生（74%为女性）的在线调查显示，一个包含四个方面（即友善、道德、能力、责任心）的测量模型显示，该模型适合12个学生群体。对女性的刻板印象是积极的

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Review of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

8.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.). The International Review of Social Psychology publishes empirical research and theoretical notes in all areas of social psychology. Articles are written preferably in English but can also be written in French. The journal was created to reflect research advances in a field where theoretical and fundamental questions inevitably convey social significance and implications. It emphasizes scientific quality of its publications in every area of social psychology. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.