Effect of Blast-induced Ground Vibration on Factor of Safety of Pit Wall Stability

Pirat Jaroonpattanapong, Kittikun Pantachang, S Thungfung, N Petthong
{"title":"Effect of Blast-induced Ground Vibration on Factor of Safety of Pit Wall Stability","authors":"Pirat Jaroonpattanapong, Kittikun Pantachang, S Thungfung, N Petthong","doi":"10.29227/IM-2020-02-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regulated maximum peak particle velocity (PPV) from blasting operations of an open-pit coal mine is less than 2 mm/s to prevent mainly any public disturbance such as ground vibration and air blast. However, the blast-induce ground vibration can also decrease the stability of pit slope, which has not been intensively studied. A claystone pit wall, which is geotechnically investigated as having a plane failure type and the natural condition factor of safety (FS), has been selected for this study. The FS is selected to measure the effect of blast-induced ground vibration on the slope stability. The limit equilibrium, pseudo-static 1 (), and pseudo-static 2 () methods are used to determine the FS. The vibration results of blasting monitored at three slope positions: crest, middle, and toe, from two areas at the same pit wall, are recorded by blasting seismographs. Maximum charge weight per delay and the distance from blast areas to seismographs are collected to construct the scaled distance. The percentage change of FS of three methods from both areas compared to natural condition FS are all less than 4 percent considered that the slope stability is safe from blasting vibration (less than 15 percent). The relationship between the FS and maximum PPV from the limit equilibrium, pseudo-static 1 (), and pseudo-static 2 () methods indicate that the adverse maximum PPVs given the unity FS are 16.60 and 4.58, and 4.74 mm/s, respectively. The regulated PPV less than 2 mm/s at the mine is reasonable to prevent any possible plane failure. However, many impact parameters have not been included in this study, and their effects may disturb the pit wall stability.","PeriodicalId":79497,"journal":{"name":"Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29227/IM-2020-02-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulated maximum peak particle velocity (PPV) from blasting operations of an open-pit coal mine is less than 2 mm/s to prevent mainly any public disturbance such as ground vibration and air blast. However, the blast-induce ground vibration can also decrease the stability of pit slope, which has not been intensively studied. A claystone pit wall, which is geotechnically investigated as having a plane failure type and the natural condition factor of safety (FS), has been selected for this study. The FS is selected to measure the effect of blast-induced ground vibration on the slope stability. The limit equilibrium, pseudo-static 1 (), and pseudo-static 2 () methods are used to determine the FS. The vibration results of blasting monitored at three slope positions: crest, middle, and toe, from two areas at the same pit wall, are recorded by blasting seismographs. Maximum charge weight per delay and the distance from blast areas to seismographs are collected to construct the scaled distance. The percentage change of FS of three methods from both areas compared to natural condition FS are all less than 4 percent considered that the slope stability is safe from blasting vibration (less than 15 percent). The relationship between the FS and maximum PPV from the limit equilibrium, pseudo-static 1 (), and pseudo-static 2 () methods indicate that the adverse maximum PPVs given the unity FS are 16.60 and 4.58, and 4.74 mm/s, respectively. The regulated PPV less than 2 mm/s at the mine is reasonable to prevent any possible plane failure. However, many impact parameters have not been included in this study, and their effects may disturb the pit wall stability.
爆破诱发地面振动对坑壁稳定安全系数的影响
露天煤矿爆破作业的规定最大峰值颗粒速度(PPV)小于2 mm/s,主要防止任何公众干扰,如地面振动和空气冲击。然而,爆破引起的地面振动也会降低基坑边坡的稳定性,这一问题尚未得到深入研究。本研究选择了一个粘土岩坑壁,该坑壁经过岩土工程研究,具有平面破坏类型和自然条件安全系数(FS)。选择FS来测量爆破引起的地面振动对边坡稳定性的影响。极限平衡、伪静态1()和伪静态2()方法用于确定FS。用爆破地震仪记录了同一坑壁上两个区域的顶部、中部和底部三个斜坡位置的爆破振动结果。收集每个延迟的最大装药重量和从爆炸区到地震仪的距离,以构建缩放距离。两个区域的三种方法的FS与自然条件FS相比的百分比变化均小于4%,认为边坡稳定性不受爆破振动的影响(小于15%)。极限平衡、伪静态1()和伪静态2()方法的FS和最大PPV之间的关系表明,给定单位FS的不利最大PPV分别为16.60、4.58和4.74mm/s。矿井规定的PPV小于2 mm/s是合理的,以防止任何可能的平面故障。然而,本研究中没有包括许多冲击参数,它们的影响可能会干扰坑壁的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信