{"title":"On the conditional marker “zhě”(者)","authors":"Fanxi Li","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.19022.li","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper aims to explain the development of “zhě” serving as a conditional marker mainly in Late Archaic Chinese\n and to show that the conditional marker “zhě” derives from the nominalizer “zhě”. The grammaticalization of “zhě” is at the level\n of pragmatic inference, which shows an interaction of nominalization, topicality, and conditionality. Nominalization directly\n makes the original clause lose its ability to confirm the factuality of the event, and the nominalized construction then is\n endowed with a generic meaning, which is in some way related to conditionals. Specifically, the contexts triggering this\n grammaticalization can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the construction “VP/clause + zhě” always occupies the topic position;\n secondly, VPs/clauses in that construction always represent a kind of non-factual event, which means that the semantic feature of\n the VPs/clauses is non-factual or unreal. Furthermore, there are two clues, namely modal auxiliary and negator, which can help\n identify the non-factual event.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.19022.li","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to explain the development of “zhě” serving as a conditional marker mainly in Late Archaic Chinese
and to show that the conditional marker “zhě” derives from the nominalizer “zhě”. The grammaticalization of “zhě” is at the level
of pragmatic inference, which shows an interaction of nominalization, topicality, and conditionality. Nominalization directly
makes the original clause lose its ability to confirm the factuality of the event, and the nominalized construction then is
endowed with a generic meaning, which is in some way related to conditionals. Specifically, the contexts triggering this
grammaticalization can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the construction “VP/clause + zhě” always occupies the topic position;
secondly, VPs/clauses in that construction always represent a kind of non-factual event, which means that the semantic feature of
the VPs/clauses is non-factual or unreal. Furthermore, there are two clues, namely modal auxiliary and negator, which can help
identify the non-factual event.