The Observed Inefficiency of Explosions to Produce Large Aftershocks: Båth’s Law for Explosions is 2.5

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
S. Ford, W. Walter
{"title":"The Observed Inefficiency of Explosions to Produce Large Aftershocks: Båth’s Law for Explosions is 2.5","authors":"S. Ford, W. Walter","doi":"10.1785/0220230183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Underground explosions are observed to produce fewer and smaller aftershocks than similar size earthquakes. The seismic magnitude difference Δmx between an explosion and its largest aftershock is an expression of Båth’s law for explosions. Based on an analysis of a compilation of aftershock studies from Soviet testing at the Semipalatinsk test site in Kazakhstan and observations from American testing at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), we find that the average magnitude difference for explosions Δmx‾ is about 2.5. Based on the NNSS data, two standard deviations of Δmx is about 1.5. In all the cases studied, from ton to megaton yield, from shallow to overburied depth, and chemical or nuclear source, no explosion aftershock has been larger than the explosion that preceded it. In fact, the two events at the NNSS with the largest aftershock magnitudes relative to the explosion are associated with the collapse of the cavity created by the explosion. This is similar to observations from North Korean testing at the Punggye-ri Test Site, where the largest seismic event following the test is attributed to the collapse after the 2017 explosion and is from 0.8 to 2 magnitude units less than the mainshock.","PeriodicalId":21687,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underground explosions are observed to produce fewer and smaller aftershocks than similar size earthquakes. The seismic magnitude difference Δmx between an explosion and its largest aftershock is an expression of Båth’s law for explosions. Based on an analysis of a compilation of aftershock studies from Soviet testing at the Semipalatinsk test site in Kazakhstan and observations from American testing at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), we find that the average magnitude difference for explosions Δmx‾ is about 2.5. Based on the NNSS data, two standard deviations of Δmx is about 1.5. In all the cases studied, from ton to megaton yield, from shallow to overburied depth, and chemical or nuclear source, no explosion aftershock has been larger than the explosion that preceded it. In fact, the two events at the NNSS with the largest aftershock magnitudes relative to the explosion are associated with the collapse of the cavity created by the explosion. This is similar to observations from North Korean testing at the Punggye-ri Test Site, where the largest seismic event following the test is attributed to the collapse after the 2017 explosion and is from 0.8 to 2 magnitude units less than the mainshock.
观察到的爆炸产生大余震的低效率:爆炸的巴巴斯定律为2.5
据观察,地下爆炸产生的余震比类似规模的地震更少、更小。一次爆炸与其最大的余震之间的震级差异Δmx是爆炸的巴斯定律的一种表达。根据对苏联在哈萨克斯坦塞米巴拉金斯克试验场测试的余震研究汇编的分析,以及美国在内华达国家安全试验场(NNSS)测试的观察,我们发现爆炸Δmx的平均震级差约为2.5。基于NNSS数据,Δmx的两个标准差约为1.5。在所有研究的案例中,从吨级到百万吨当量,从浅层到深埋,以及化学或核源,没有爆炸余震比之前的爆炸更大。事实上,在NNSS中,相对于爆炸而言,余震震级最大的两个事件都与爆炸产生的空洞塌陷有关。这与朝鲜丰溪里核试验场的观测结果相似。在丰溪里核试验后发生的最大地震事件被认为是2017年爆炸后的坍塌,比主震小0.8到2个震级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismological Research Letters
Seismological Research Letters 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信