Interlocutors’ judgment of Lx conventional expressions: An exploratory study

IF 1.8 2区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Intercultural Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1515/ip-2022-5003

Suzie Beaulieu, F. Lundell, Javier Bejarano

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The present study is a perception study that investigates how French L1 speakers evaluate the speech produced by advanced French Lx users that deviates from the pragmatic norms of the local community. More specifically, this exploratory study investigates how conventional expressions that displayed pragmalinguistic or sociopragmatic deviances affected the raters’ (N = 62) evaluation of perceived communicative effectiveness and perceived likeability of the speakers in imagined intercultural encounters. Results from the study revealed that deviances were generally judged more severely on both evaluative dimensions than the target conventional expressions. Interestingly, however, findings also showed that deviances that partly included the pragmalinguistic or sociopragmatic resources preferred by target community members were evaluated positively. Methodological recommendations to pursue this new line of inquiry in the field of intercultural pragmatics are also discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对话者对Lx常规表达的判断：一项探索性研究

摘要本研究是一项感知研究，旨在调查法语母语使用者如何评价高级法语母语使用者偏离当地社区语用规范的言语。更具体地说，这项探索性研究探讨了在想象的跨文化接触中，显示语用语言学或社会语用偏差的传统表达如何影响评分者(N = 62)对说话者感知交际有效性和感知亲和力的评估。研究结果表明，在两个评价维度上，偏差通常比目标常规表达更严重。然而，有趣的是，研究结果还表明，部分包含目标社区成员偏好的语用语言或社会语用资源的偏差得到了积极的评价。本文还讨论了在跨文化语用学领域探索这一新的研究方向的方法建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Intercultural Pragmatics Multiple-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

36.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Intercultural Pragmatics is a fully peer-reviewed forum for theoretical and applied pragmatics research. The goal of the journal is to promote the development and understanding of pragmatic theory and intercultural competence by publishing research that focuses on general theoretical issues, more than one language and culture, or varieties of one language. Intercultural Pragmatics encourages ‘interculturality’ both within the discipline and in pragmatic research. It supports interaction and scholarly debate between researchers representing different subfields of pragmatics including the linguistic, cognitive, social, and interlanguage paradigms. The intercultural perspective is relevant not only to each line of research within pragmatics but also extends to several other disciplines such as anthropology, theoretical and applied linguistics, psychology, communication, sociolinguistics, second language acquisition, and bi- and multilingualism. Intercultural Pragmatics makes a special effort to cross disciplinary boundaries. What we primarily look for is innovative approaches and ideas that do not always fit into existing paradigms, and lead to new ways of thinking about language. Intercultural Pragmatics has always encouraged the publication of theoretical papers including linguistic and philosophical pragmatics that are very important for research in intercultural pragmatics.