SI BULUS-BULUS SI RUMBUK-RUMBUK SEBAGAI TEKS YANG HEGEMONIK

M. Harahap, Faruk Faruk, Aprinus Salam
{"title":"SI BULUS-BULUS SI RUMBUK-RUMBUK SEBAGAI TEKS YANG HEGEMONIK","authors":"M. Harahap, Faruk Faruk, Aprinus Salam","doi":"10.24257/ATAVISME.V22I1.549.88-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain the text of Willem Iskander's Si Bulus-Bulus Si Rumbuk-Rumbuk in postcolonial discourse. The text and the author were very contradictory and paradoxical. In one side, the discourse of resistance are revealed,  but on the other hand it also kept the discourse on colonial construction. This writer uses the postcolonial approach and discursive method to analyze the penomenon. This study uses the discourse that was built by two experts, Rodgers and Harahap, who concentrated on researching the texts of Si Bulus-Bulus Si Rumbuk-Rumbuk and Willem Iskander. Through this discursive method, the writer reconstruct the opinions of the two experts using postcolonial perspective. Beside looked at the text, the writer also consider in social, political, and the Mandailing people culture as supporting culture. The results show that Willem Iskander is an ambivalent figure. A figure who voiced resistance as well as a figure who obeyed colonial construction. The implications of this article can give a theoretical contribution to postcolonial studies of literature, especially Mandailing literature","PeriodicalId":55790,"journal":{"name":"Atavisme","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atavisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24257/ATAVISME.V22I1.549.88-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to explain the text of Willem Iskander's Si Bulus-Bulus Si Rumbuk-Rumbuk in postcolonial discourse. The text and the author were very contradictory and paradoxical. In one side, the discourse of resistance are revealed,  but on the other hand it also kept the discourse on colonial construction. This writer uses the postcolonial approach and discursive method to analyze the penomenon. This study uses the discourse that was built by two experts, Rodgers and Harahap, who concentrated on researching the texts of Si Bulus-Bulus Si Rumbuk-Rumbuk and Willem Iskander. Through this discursive method, the writer reconstruct the opinions of the two experts using postcolonial perspective. Beside looked at the text, the writer also consider in social, political, and the Mandailing people culture as supporting culture. The results show that Willem Iskander is an ambivalent figure. A figure who voiced resistance as well as a figure who obeyed colonial construction. The implications of this article can give a theoretical contribution to postcolonial studies of literature, especially Mandailing literature
本研究旨在阐释后殖民话语中的威廉·伊斯坎德的《诗》文本。文本和作者非常矛盾和自相矛盾。一方面,反抗的话语被揭示出来,但另一方面,它也保留了殖民地建设的话语。本文运用后殖民的方法和话语的方法来分析彭诺门。本研究采用了罗杰斯和哈拉哈普两位专家构建的语篇,他们集中研究了《斯布鲁斯·布鲁斯·斯伦布克·伦布克》和威廉·伊斯坎德的文本。通过这种话语方式,作者运用后殖民主义的视角重构了两位专家的观点。在审视文本的同时,作者还将社会、政治、曼德勒人文化视为支撑文化。结果表明,伊斯坎德是一个矛盾的人物,一个反抗的人物,也是一个服从殖民主义建设的人物。这篇文章的启示可以为后殖民文学研究,特别是曼德勒文学的研究做出理论贡献
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信