Whose Interest Really Matters? The Role of NGOs’ Representatives within Local Advisory Councils in Poland

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Anna Kołomycew
{"title":"Whose Interest Really Matters? The Role of NGOs’ Representatives within Local Advisory Councils in Poland","authors":"Anna Kołomycew","doi":"10.1177/08883254221124954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article shows the results of empirical research conducted among members of advisory councils operating in Polish cities. The study covers five types of councils: councils of NGOs, senior citizen councils, councils for residents with disabilities, labor market councils, and sports councils. The author focuses mainly on advisory council members who are also NGO representatives. Thus, they have a twofold role: a member of a collegial advisory body, which is supposed to consult local authorities, and a representative of an NGO. The article aims to reveal the motives for engaging NGOs’ representatives in social council activities. Considering the specific character of the NGO sector in Poland, one may expect that membership within social councils will become an arena for pushing the interests of NGOs. However, research results show that the motivations for involvement in social council activities do not have clientelistic patterns. The members of the councils are motivated by similar factors as in other forms of prosocial activity, which may be divided into normative, rational, and affiliative-prestigious. Council members are aware of their double role. They, therefore, distance themselves from the possibility of achieving individual (private) benefits or benefits for the NGO they are associated with. Their membership in councils is motivated primarily by a sense of duty to the group or the organization they represent or local authorities, taking part in the decision-making, and being a member of the prestigious group of experts they consider advisory councils to be.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"37 1","pages":"903 - 926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221124954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article shows the results of empirical research conducted among members of advisory councils operating in Polish cities. The study covers five types of councils: councils of NGOs, senior citizen councils, councils for residents with disabilities, labor market councils, and sports councils. The author focuses mainly on advisory council members who are also NGO representatives. Thus, they have a twofold role: a member of a collegial advisory body, which is supposed to consult local authorities, and a representative of an NGO. The article aims to reveal the motives for engaging NGOs’ representatives in social council activities. Considering the specific character of the NGO sector in Poland, one may expect that membership within social councils will become an arena for pushing the interests of NGOs. However, research results show that the motivations for involvement in social council activities do not have clientelistic patterns. The members of the councils are motivated by similar factors as in other forms of prosocial activity, which may be divided into normative, rational, and affiliative-prestigious. Council members are aware of their double role. They, therefore, distance themselves from the possibility of achieving individual (private) benefits or benefits for the NGO they are associated with. Their membership in councils is motivated primarily by a sense of duty to the group or the organization they represent or local authorities, taking part in the decision-making, and being a member of the prestigious group of experts they consider advisory councils to be.
谁的利益真正重要?非政府组织代表在波兰地方咨询委员会中的作用
这篇文章展示了在波兰城市运作的咨询委员会成员中进行的实证研究的结果。该研究涵盖五种类型的委员会:非政府组织委员会、老年人委员会、残疾居民委员会、劳动力市场委员会和体育委员会。作者主要关注咨询委员会成员,他们也是非政府组织的代表。因此,他们有双重作用:一个是与地方当局协商的合议咨询机构的成员,另一个是非政府组织的代表。本文旨在揭示非政府组织代表参与社会理事会活动的动机。考虑到波兰非政府组织部门的特殊性,人们可以预期,社会理事会的成员资格将成为推动非政府组织利益的舞台。然而,研究结果表明,参与社会理事会活动的动机并不具有客户主义模式。理事会成员的动机与其他形式的亲社会活动类似,可分为规范性、理性和附属声望。安理会成员意识到他们的双重作用。因此,他们与实现个人(私人)利益或与他们有关联的非政府组织利益的可能性保持距离。他们加入理事会的动机主要是对他们所代表的团体、组织或地方当局的责任感,参与决策,并成为他们认为是咨询理事会的著名专家小组的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信