Unvaccinated and left out: The mismatch of vaccine supply and demand during COVID-19 as a source of interpersonal and societal exclusion

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Melissa Jauch, Christiane M. Büttner, Elianne A. Albath, Rainer Greifeneder
{"title":"Unvaccinated and left out: The mismatch of vaccine supply and demand during COVID-19 as a source of interpersonal and societal exclusion","authors":"Melissa Jauch,&nbsp;Christiane M. Büttner,&nbsp;Elianne A. Albath,&nbsp;Rainer Greifeneder","doi":"10.1111/asap.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>At the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, many countries faced a mismatch between the demand and supply of vaccines. Particularly in countries where different rights were granted to vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, this situation may have fostered what we here refer to as <i>policy-induced feelings of social exclusion</i>. Using data from Germany in spring 2021, we investigate how individuals’ vaccination status related to feelings of (1) being excluded by others (interpersonal level) and (2) being excluded by the government (societal level) at a time when vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals had different rights. We find that being unvaccinated is associated with feeling excluded by others and by the government and that individuals generally report higher levels of exclusion by the government than by other people. These findings have important implications for policymakers not only in times of a pandemic but in light of major crises more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"23 3","pages":"537-551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12360","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, many countries faced a mismatch between the demand and supply of vaccines. Particularly in countries where different rights were granted to vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, this situation may have fostered what we here refer to as policy-induced feelings of social exclusion. Using data from Germany in spring 2021, we investigate how individuals’ vaccination status related to feelings of (1) being excluded by others (interpersonal level) and (2) being excluded by the government (societal level) at a time when vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals had different rights. We find that being unvaccinated is associated with feeling excluded by others and by the government and that individuals generally report higher levels of exclusion by the government than by other people. These findings have important implications for policymakers not only in times of a pandemic but in light of major crises more generally.

Abstract Image

未接种疫苗和被遗漏:COVID - 19期间疫苗供需不匹配是人际和社会排斥的一个来源
在新冠肺炎疫苗接种运动开始时,许多国家面临疫苗供需不匹配的问题。特别是在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的个人享有不同权利的国家,这种情况可能助长了我们在这里所说的政策引发的社会排斥感。利用2021年春季来自德国的数据,我们调查了在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的个人拥有不同权利的情况下,个人的疫苗接种状况如何与(1)被他人排斥(人际层面)和(2)被政府排斥(社会层面)的感觉相关。我们发现,未接种疫苗与感觉被他人和政府排斥有关,个人通常报告被政府排斥的程度高于其他人。这些发现不仅在疫情期间,而且在更普遍的重大危机中,对政策制定者都有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信