Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos: A play on more than just ethical failures

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Medina Williams
{"title":"Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos: A play on more than just ethical failures","authors":"Medina Williams","doi":"10.1177/02663821221088899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elizabeth Holmes promised a revolution in blood testing protocols by building innovative technology and process efficiencies in an industry ripe for disruption. Along with Ramesh Balwani, she recruited investors under the guise of these promises and raked in millions of dollars in addition to lucrative private partnerships to bring her vision for the company, Theranos, to fruition. Behind the scenes, the enforcement of strict codes of secrecy left many in the scientific community skeptical of such claims as the company chose to abandon standard procedures including peer review. Additionally, the company initially employed a “board of advisors” versus a board of directors, with many of the members sourced from previously held positions of power in business and the military. Members of the news press soon joined in on the skepticism, and the company began to implode in 2014. Two key whistleblowers emerged, one of which had a familial relationship with a key Theranos backer and member of the advisory board. Lawsuits from investors followed and applicable regulatory authorities began investigations. Inquiries by three separate government bodies resulted in charges of conspiracy and several counts of wire fraud levied on both Ms. Holmes and Mr. Balwani in addition to suspension of the company’s licensure. The Theranos saga reads as an ethical tragedy that had an opportunity to be anything but.","PeriodicalId":39735,"journal":{"name":"Business Information Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"23 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821221088899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Elizabeth Holmes promised a revolution in blood testing protocols by building innovative technology and process efficiencies in an industry ripe for disruption. Along with Ramesh Balwani, she recruited investors under the guise of these promises and raked in millions of dollars in addition to lucrative private partnerships to bring her vision for the company, Theranos, to fruition. Behind the scenes, the enforcement of strict codes of secrecy left many in the scientific community skeptical of such claims as the company chose to abandon standard procedures including peer review. Additionally, the company initially employed a “board of advisors” versus a board of directors, with many of the members sourced from previously held positions of power in business and the military. Members of the news press soon joined in on the skepticism, and the company began to implode in 2014. Two key whistleblowers emerged, one of which had a familial relationship with a key Theranos backer and member of the advisory board. Lawsuits from investors followed and applicable regulatory authorities began investigations. Inquiries by three separate government bodies resulted in charges of conspiracy and several counts of wire fraud levied on both Ms. Holmes and Mr. Balwani in addition to suspension of the company’s licensure. The Theranos saga reads as an ethical tragedy that had an opportunity to be anything but.
伊丽莎白·霍姆斯和Theranos:一部关于道德失败的戏剧
伊丽莎白·霍姆斯(Elizabeth Holmes)承诺,通过在一个已经成熟的行业中建立创新技术和流程效率,将在血液检测协议方面进行一场革命。她和拉梅什·巴尔瓦尼一起,打着这些承诺的幌子招募投资者,除了利润丰厚的私人合作伙伴关系外,还赚了数百万美元,以实现她对Theranos公司的愿景。在幕后,由于该公司选择放弃包括同行评审在内的标准程序,严格保密准则的实施让科学界的许多人对这些说法持怀疑态度。此外,该公司最初雇佣了一个“顾问委员会”,而不是董事会,许多成员来自以前在商业和军队中担任的权力职位。新闻媒体的成员很快也加入了怀疑的行列,该公司在2014年开始崩溃。出现了两名关键告密者,其中一人与Theranos的一名关键支持者和咨询委员会成员有家族关系。投资者提起诉讼,相关监管机构开始调查。三个独立的政府机构的调查导致霍姆斯女士和巴尔瓦尼先生被指控犯有共谋罪和几项电信欺诈罪,此外还被暂停了公司的许可证。Theranos传奇故事被解读为一场道德悲剧,而这场悲剧本有机会成为另一场悲剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Information Review
Business Information Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Business Information Review (BIR) is concerned with information and knowledge management within organisations. To be successful organisations need to gain maximum value from exploiting relevant information and knowledge. BIR deals with information strategies and operational good practice across the range of activities required to deliver this information dividend. The journal aims to highlight developments in the economic, social and technological landscapes that will impact the way organisations operate. BIR also provides insights into the factors that contribute to individual professional success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信