{"title":"Ethical questions arising from Otfrid Foerster’s use of the Sherrington method to map human dermatomes","authors":"B. Freeman, J. Carmody, D. Grace","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2022.2029226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Otfrid Foerster (1873–1941) is well known for his maps of human dermatomes. We have examined the history of the development of his protocols for mapping dermatomes by analyzing his lectures and publications from 1908 to 1939, focusing on his Schorstein Memorial Lecture in 1932 and his use of the isolation (Sherrington) method, in which a single dorsal root is spared in a sequence of resections (dorsal rhizotomies). Because of the absence of medical records for Foerster’s patients, we also review eyewitness accounts of his operating technique, his occasional comments on patients, and the issue of consent. There appears to be no medical justification—at that time or currently—for Foerster’s use of the Sherrington method to map dermatomes L1, L5, S1, and S2, and in our view, these results were obtained unethically. Hence, clinicians and researchers who use his maps should acknowledge those whom Foerster exploited in order to produce them.","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"490 - 511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2022.2029226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Otfrid Foerster (1873–1941) is well known for his maps of human dermatomes. We have examined the history of the development of his protocols for mapping dermatomes by analyzing his lectures and publications from 1908 to 1939, focusing on his Schorstein Memorial Lecture in 1932 and his use of the isolation (Sherrington) method, in which a single dorsal root is spared in a sequence of resections (dorsal rhizotomies). Because of the absence of medical records for Foerster’s patients, we also review eyewitness accounts of his operating technique, his occasional comments on patients, and the issue of consent. There appears to be no medical justification—at that time or currently—for Foerster’s use of the Sherrington method to map dermatomes L1, L5, S1, and S2, and in our view, these results were obtained unethically. Hence, clinicians and researchers who use his maps should acknowledge those whom Foerster exploited in order to produce them.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.